04-18-89 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES A,PRIL 18, 1989 PAGE 4 j by the Planner, coincided with the ordinance. If we should go with th RE map prepared by the PZ, the proposed ordinance, prepared by the City Planner, would need to be amended. Williams felt the recommended ordinances submitted by the planner should serve as a sound basis of any ordinance we would want to adopt. and several_ others Williams stated hegtook the time to read the Comp Plan carefully and submitted a number of suggested corrections in the spirit that we all had agreed to take the 1986 plan and rework it slightly and use the existing zoning map ffor the LUMa on an interim co prom s . He asked Moe & Graves why they Hid not su�mit Mitten comments. AAmmen e 4-24-89)* If a Council worksession is to be held, Graves urged the City Admin to consolidate what she would perceive to be a consensus agreement on what the majority of the Council would agree on beforehand. This would be a point from which we could start a discussion. Williams would like to see in writing specific problems, that Moe and Graves, have with the plan. Graves responded there are statements in the plan for no planning for commercial development at all along I-94. With^�hat.typ� of statement in the Plan, Graves felt we might as well restrict a�ni er i g north of loth Street and watch Oakdale and Woodbury fight over the properties. A Council worksession on the Comp Plan will be held on Tuesday, April 25th, at 7:00 p.m. in City Hall. B. Rezoning RR-R1, Packard Park 3rd Addition, Gene Peltier C. PRD Concept Plan, The Forest, Morton/Engstrom On March 7th, the City Council directed the PZ to review, on a city-wide basis appropriate future R-1 placem ntithi h a review inclusion and consideration of The Forestanda `Ic= s a� tad-e- 9_Vi-ew--of -th'e-Paeka-r-d--Pmt-r -r-dAd ien, for consequent amendment of the Comp Plan and return with their recommendation for the April 4th Council meeting. The PZ discussed potential future R1 zoning in the City and made the following motion: "M/S/P DeLapp/Dick Johnson - to recommend to the City Council that "The Forest" and "Packard Park 3rd Addition" be rezoned to Rl based on the idea that this rezoning will have inconsequential. impact on the Comp Plan and the PZ indicated they will consider other areas at a future date for R-1 Zoning. (Motion carried 6-3: Dave Johnson: Packard Park 3rd Addn, is already adjacent to R-1 Zoning and should be rezoned to R-•1. He considered the Engstrom application as spotzoni.ng; Ann Bucheck: voted for denial based on the water problem in the area; Steve DeLapp: submitted his recommendations as referenced in Appendix B of PZ minutes). Councilmen Williams was in favor of the concept plan, The Forest, in concert with the 2 1/2 acre zoning proposal. He was not in favor of voting for a rezoning because he wanted to see the PZ to look at the entire City for R-1 areas, not just the two proposals. Councilman Hunt would still stick by the CC decision on 3-7-89 and would like to see RE Zoning in certain areas in the City. Councilman Moe was willing to vote, now, on either development and amend *Amended 4-2 - Graves responded to Councilman Wms' statement that he made comments at the 4-10-89 Joint Meeting which are reflected in the minutes of this meeting.