My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-16-90 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1990
>
01-16-90 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 7:00:36 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:16:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MC 7 IMS <br />TA <br />TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON <br />AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED <br />.1GINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS <br />2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL SANK BUILDING <br />SAINT PAUL NINNESOTA 55101 <br />51=92 O <br />December6, 1989 <br />FAX 01L292-00W <br />Planning and Zoning Conunission <br />Lake Elmo, Minnesota <br />Re: Packard Park 3rd Addition <br />Lake Elmo, Minnesota <br />Commission No. 9150-009 <br />Dear Commission Members: <br />We understand that at the last PZC meeting a question arose regarding whether Lot 1, Block 1, <br />Packard Park 3rd Addition meets the drainfield area requirements. The following is our opinion: <br />The statement in question is found in paragraph (6) in page 301-34 of the Zoning Code. It states: <br />"All lots must have at least one (1) acre of land suitable for septic drainfields and area <br />sufficient for two (2) separate and distinct drainfield sites. Placement of the second <br />required drainfield between the trenches of the first drainflield is prohibited." <br />A problem of interpretation arises immediately because the fast sentence contains two <br />requirements for area (one acre suitable and area for two sites). Because these two requirements <br />are connected by the word and means that both requirements must be met. However, the <br />requirement for one acre of land is much greater than the requirement for two sites, which would <br />be at most one-fourth of an acre. <br />It is my opinion that the requirement for "one acre of land suitable ....1. came about because of the <br />past subdivision practices in Lake Elmo. Lots around the existing lakes and ponds in the Tri- <br />Lakes area of the city were often pie -shaped, being platted out into the water. These lots could <br />meet the legal lot size requirement but yet only have a small building site available due to the <br />presence of a pond, wetland, or drainage easement. I believe the Code was changed to insure <br />that at least one acre of the lot was "high ground". On the other hand, having a large lot of all <br />high ground does not insure that there is one acre available for drainfields. For example, the lots <br />in Lake Elmo Heights 2nd - Addition are all high ground, but due to slow percolating soils, <br />some lots still had to be increased in size to have one acre of suitable soil. <br />Over the past ten years, I have tried to evaluate new subdivisions consistently in regard to area <br />available for drainfields. When a preliminary plat was submitted, I would consult the <br />Washington County Soil Survey. This document has proved to be reliable over the years with <br />only <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.