Laserfiche WebLink
__,Zanning'ting Commission <br />Lake Elrpo, Minnesota <br />December 6, 1989 <br />Page Two <br />a few exceptions. if the Soil Survey showed that each lot had at least one acre of land which was <br />eids or <br />not classifids ��n easements, then I felt limitations <br />lot metdth�QuirementttOf Onedby water or not acre of land suitable...•° If <br />by drainage <br />the Soil Survey map showed there was not one acre suitable, then I required the developer to <br />perform soil borings and Percolation tests over an area sufficient for two draicom sites <br />(generally l bori SF). If the tests proved there was 10,000 SF available, I recommended <br />ed. I have never interpreted the "one <br />approval 1 the lot size If presented. If 10,000 SF could not be found, I recommended that tile <br />subdivision not be approved until the lot sizes were reseenlarved <br />acre of ewer to have..." to rolean one acre Must <br />suitable so that bherescould becflexibility in locatmg�he actual ve <br />the intent <br />system on the lot. <br />rah 6 on age 301-34 of the Zoning Code. <br />h <br />Using the above described interpretation of it <br />Code. Lot 1, Block 1, Packard Park 3rd Addition <br />does meet the requirements of paragraph P <br />Sincerely yours, <br />Larry D. Bohrer, P.E. <br />LDB:j <br />cc: Bruce Folz <br />