04-02-91 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 2, 1991 PAGE h M/S/F Dick Johnson/Mottaz - that the Adkins' property, at 2227 Lake Elmo Avenue and surrounding property owned by Mr. Adkins, continue to be shown as SRD on the Future Land Use Map and amend the text of the Comprehensive Plan to allow this one last area remain SRD and as future zoning be allowed as SRD; further, it remain city policy that, there be no additional R1 development in the City. (Motion failed 3-2: Hunt: He sees a conflict between the map and the text and is looking at the Attorney for the best way to resolve it., Williams: Without doing a thorough study, this type of .problem (person does not own enough land to make an RE development) will come up in the future. The landowner has the option of developing at the current zoning or acquire additional land from his neighboring property owners to provide 20 acres.) In order to amend the text of the Comp Plan, it requires 4/5th majority vote of the Council. M/ Williams - to postpone consideration of this matter until the next meeting at which time we will expect to receive from the City Attorney a clarification of the procedures. The Mayor did not recognize Councilman Williams and the above motion. Councilman Williams appealed from the action of the Chair/No second to the appeal. Mayor Johnson stated we do not have to change the text of the Comp Plan. We can simply leave the map "as is" and when a request comes in for rezoning, allow that R1 zoning. He noted this is the last piece of SRD property we have in the City. M/No second Mottaz/No Second - to accept the Future Land Use Map with the SRD land designation for Mr. Adkins' property. Mayor Johnson noted there needs to be a motion to amend the Comp Plan to change the SRD to RED Zoning. M/No Second Williams/No Second - to amend. the Comp Plan to reflect the 12 acres owned by Clifford Adkins as RED instead of SRD Zoning. When asked if this item could be postponed for two weeks, Mr. Adkins indicated he had no urgent plans for development.__ M/S/P Williams/Dick Johnson - to postpone consideration of this item until the next Council meeting at which time we can expect from the City Attorney clarification of the procedure to be used. (Motion carried 5-0).