Laserfiche WebLink
(4) Jane Court N. <br />This street has reached the stage where it is in need of an overlay. There is significant cracking on the <br />eastern 700-feet of the street. The street is about 24-feet wide. A 1 %a -inch overlay is proposed on the <br />western 800-feet of the road, up to Jane Circle. West of Jane Circle, a 2 %-inch overlay is proposed. Each <br />shoulder will also be constructed. The two catch basins near the curve will be rebuilt, with new flumes <br />constructed around them. They will pave a small area off the side of the road for children to wait for the <br />school buses. <br />Mayor John opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m. in the Council chambers. <br />Charles Altstatt, 9330 Jane Court N., explained on the hill that goes down there is a sinkhole. The drainage <br />comes into his front lot and asked if the City could put a black top ditch or culvert to divert the water to a <br />proper area. Would he be assessed for Outlet B, which is an unbuildable lot? Prew responded that an <br />unbuildable lot is not assessed. If it is used as a recreational lot, it may be assessed. <br />Mayor John closed the public hearing at 7:56 p.m. <br />(5) 33rd Street Lane <br />At one time this street had a bituminous surface. However, the old surface was milled up because of its <br />very poor condition. The street has remained gravel since then. A 3-inch thick, 22-foot wide street is <br />proposed. The street is about 900-feet long. Earth shoulders would also be constructed. <br />Mayor John opened the public hearing at 7:57 p.m. in the Council Chambers. <br />John Heroff, 10925 33 d Street Lane N., currently seven residents use this street, but there is actually 5 <br />residents that have 33`d Street Lane as their addresses, how would they be assessed? Prew responded he <br />goes off of the addresses they use. <br />Mayor John closed the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. <br />(6) Hill Trail N. <br />This street has reached the stage when an overlay is necessary. A 2-inch thick overlay is proposed. Earth <br />shoulders would also be constructed. As part of this project, the City Staff has recommend that right-of- <br />way survey be conducted to determine the exact location of the street within the right-of-way. <br />Mayor John opened the public hearing at 8:01 p.m. in the Council Chambers. <br />Rodney Harvey, 7949 Hill Trail Court N., felt that he should not be assessed because he did not have <br />frontage on Hill Trail. Hill Trail Court N. is a dirt track. His mailbox sits on Hill Trail N. <br />Norm Purrington, 8000 Hill Trail N., questioned if an overlay is necessary because he does not see the <br />deterioration. He moved to this area for the rural nature and does not want the improvement. He would not <br />want to see the lawns, decorative planting, stone walls, that have been placed in the right-of-way be <br />disrupted. Cars would be parking along his property that cannot fit into the lake access parking. Concern of <br />widening the road would increase speed. It needs a speed limit change to 15 mph. Why should the <br />residents pay for a new survey if the road was put in wrong twenty years ago. Tom Prew responded he <br />would like the overlay before the road looses its structural integrity. The survey will be paid by the City <br />and not by the project. <br />George Taylor, 7925 Hill Trail N., wonders if it is really necessary to improve the road, He knows the road <br />is not in the proper location. How is the City gong to straighten the road out. The drainage on the hill <br />towards Purrington's is terrible. The shoulders are being washed away on both sides of the road in front of <br />his house. <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 5, 1998 <br />