Laserfiche WebLink
oriented to have walking paths between them and connecting to a common path system in the PUD. <br />Lighting, done by Lumec, will be a lower height of 14 %x' with the cone covering the bulb so it isn't visible <br />and light does not trespass off the site. There is a berm around site, and cars and lighting would be hidden <br />behind the berm. <br />The Council discussed the conditions, stated in the City Planner's staff report, requiring the applicant to <br />modify the proposed plan as follows: <br />1. The applicant shall comply with the PUD Master Sign Plan <br />Wildwood Lodge will have a gable sign, internally lit, front gable as well as north gable. The Machine <br />Shed restaurant sign is their trademark, and the sign matches the building and oriented close to the building. <br />There will be one sign for the Machine Shed restaurant instead of having two signs on the site for the <br />restaurant and hotel. Do away with the pylon signs with exchange for two signs on Wildwood Lodge. The <br />structure, which looks like a grain elevator, will store lawn maintenance equipment. <br />Siedow: looks good, less obtrusive than a pylon sign <br />Dunn: pylon signs out totally. <br />Hunt: wonderful concept, shows corporate image and is attractive. Agrees with this type of signage. <br />Armstrong: No pylon sign. Wouldn't want to see sign on top of the berm. Kirk Whalen: Their proposal for <br />the sign is at the intersection of the off -ramp and Inwood Avenue and on the berm. They could scale it <br />down to meet intent of the ordinance. <br />DeLapp: We already made concessions by having a PUD, and we should stick with the code. Pylon signs <br />are inappropriate <br />Agreement 4-1: DeLapp The sign that looks like a small grain elevator will be scaled down to meet <br />requirements of the code and not placed on top of the berm. <br />2. Compliance with BP district standards for exterior structure surfaces, but with a finding that the stone <br />type surfacing proposed does meet the equivalent test of the City Code. <br />DeLapp saw real stone on the buildings in Peewaukee, WI. He prefers real stone... it is not just for <br />appearance. The applicant should follow standards in the code, which require brick, stone, glass or <br />equivalent. Kirk Whalen likes the uniformity of the culture stone. It doesn't have any flaws and weathers <br />as well as real stone. <br />Armstrong felt it inappropriate to put the batten on. Would approve of cultured brick with the requirement <br />of the building being 85% brick. There should be continuity exterior structure surface between all <br />buildings. Whalen explained the batten is for accents. The Machine Shed is dedicated to the farmer and <br />board and batten made up farm residences. <br />Hunt would accept the construction materials as shown up to 15% of the building surface area made of <br />board and battan, excluding cupola and canopy. <br />Dunn had no problem with equivalent. Wood has to be well maintained. Crosshatch blended in well. <br />Siedow: no problem with brick and wood. <br />Agreement 3-1-1: Armstrong, DeLapp, 85% cultured stone as shown on plan with 15% board and batten <br />No. 3. Modification of the site plan to increase the amount of parking lot landscape: Whalen stated they <br />would adhere to the code. <br />No. 4 Whalen stated they have done the substitution of the sliding scale of the value of landscaping <br />improvements required in Chapter 520. <br />No. 5 Adhere to Lighting Requirements in Chapter 1350. The Council will discuss this later. <br />The Council discussed the eight Conditions of Approval in the Planning Commission's recommendation. <br />1. Compliance with requirements as specified in Tom Prew's letter of August 3,1999. <br />Tom Prow requested that we begin the process of construction of our own well and water storage reservoir <br />because our agreement with Oakdale for water service could be terminated in the near future. Mayor Hunt <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 3, 1999 3 <br />