My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004 May-Dec
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
2004 May-Dec
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2009 3:28:11 PM
Creation date
12/7/2009 3:27:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 10, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Gunn. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 6244, a <br />. Resolution Establishing Financing for the Mounds View Manufacturing Home Park Second <br />Access Project with Option lA to Account for the Cities Costs. <br />Rex Almond of 1046 Monte Claire indicated that he had spoken to the owner and the owner is <br />counting on an amount of $6,000. <br />Council Member Stigney amended his motion to not exceed $2,000 in City costs. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Gunn. To Amend the Motion to Proportionately Divide the City's <br />Costs Not to Exceed $2,000. <br />Mayor Linke indicated that the motion on the floor is basically the same as Option B adding <br />$2,000 to the amount the Mobile Home Park would pay. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he did his motion the way he did to keep things proportionate <br />which is fair. <br />Doris Heilman of 3034 Ardmore Avenue reminded Council that when this whole issue came up <br />it was before the Ordinance changed on giving park owners the option of whether they wanted to <br />open this. When this started they were required to do so by ordinance because the City street is <br />not in compliance. She then said that, as she understands it, the grant money was applied for on <br />• a proportional basis and it was a joint grant application. <br />Ms. Heilman asked how much City Staff time was spent planning the development previously <br />discussed and how much of that money will be recovered. She then said that their costs were to <br />be 37% of the cost of the project. <br />Mayor Linke indicated he would like to recover the City's costs from the point when the City and <br />the Park decided to do move forward. <br />Ms. Heilman noted that would be from January 2004. <br />Ms. Heilman indicated that opening the back gate benefits other residents in the area and the <br />street is a race track regardless of whether the gate opens or not. <br />Mayor Linke indicated the complaint was that the people from the mobile home park are using it <br />and they are opposed to that. <br />Ms. Heilman indicated that not all violators are within the park others use it as well. She then <br />said that the park owner alone pays more taxes than all the people who signed the petition a year <br />ago, not to mention what the individual homeowner's pay. <br />Ayes - 3 Nays - 2(Linke/Quick) Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.