Council_Minutes_1960_09_12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i'roceedin :s of t i i V i l l a ,�.►nr r 1 ctiucusoion foIlowud on t'%I) type of copilot- to bo usod in the connection from t1' norvico lino to homoo connoctln- to the water system with tho quootion cr,ncornin noanin of "1" outoido dianetor typo i; copp s r line" oeucifiud in tho lator Ordinanco It was tho •;onernl eonsonouu of opinion rind the Council concurrod that 3/4" ID Typo 7 copper tubin 000 tau minimum typo roquirod. P.r. i.oyors, Villao .ttorr+.uy, wau ino'ructud to amend the later Ordinanco to clarify the moenin of tho type ruquirud within tho Ordinance. lir. Edmond, Villa,,e ✓luctricnl Ino,.cctc;r, reported to tho Council that a lar „o number of V111nr;o ruoi''onts hnvu boon doing their own oloctricnl work without rcqueotin; ,urr►its or inspoction of avid work. hayor Crano stntod that an item concornin„ this would be insortod in thu lo„al ncwspnper infortiin.; rosidonts that said work without permits is illo ;al in accordance with Villago ordinances. Upon aokin; buoinoos from the floor, Pare. Ralph ;'otorson asked the Council when the stroot li_;hts at Knoll and Lois Drivoa would bo roplacod. '.nid li;'hto woro removed for tho water construction projoct on those streets. Othor lights wo+'o also reported missing at Rod Onk and .iillview, County Road I12 and liwy. 10, rwy. 10 and Grovoland, and County Road :12 and Jackson. Mayor Crane atatod that the reason for said li, ;hts not having boon re-installed after the construction project wee completod would be invosti.atod and an attompt would bo m.do to rectify this situation. Mr. Leroy i.rrsolias appeared before the Council and said that a draina, ;e ditch is boin„ constructed on his property and insofar as he knows, an easement for ouch ditch does not exist. Iir. Naroolias was infornod by the Council that the En ;ineor would in- veoti,ato thin and a further report would be Wade to the Council. The subject of replacement of tar or street surfacinG on Jackson Drivo at allview was brou=ht to the attention of the Council. The Eneinoor stated that this section was not included in the ori;inal construction bid and that it appears that the roconditionin..; of this street :could be the responsibility of tho Village instead of the contractor for the construction project con- cerned. It was also stated that the contracten firm of Sandstrom c i;afner would cican the streets after tho service connections are completed in the areas for which they contracted. hr. lialvin brou' ht to the attention of the Council the question of whether or not tho contract with tho construction firms contain a clause showin- whether the contractor is held or is not held responsible for re- soddinl; of boulevards. The Attorney was instruc- ted to examine the contract of ;rojects 1960 -1 and 1960 -2 to deter- mine this question. i.r. Stole su-,;ected that the individual resi- dents pay for their own re- so:'.din of bculovc.rds rather than on a villa -e aide basis, which wculd perhaps involve further assessments for such rc- sodding.