My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1960/10/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1960-1969
>
1960
>
Minutes - 1960/10/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:58:08 PM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:20:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
10/10/1960
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of the Meeting of Cictober 10, 1960. (Page 2) <br />C.if:j6 <br />Upon asking from reports from various committees Mayor Crane <br />was informed that the Planning Committee had no official meport <br />on thair last meering since a quorum was not present at that <br />meering. Mr. Stole pointed out that Mr. Howard Dahlgren the <br />Village Planner, presented a plannin- report on that date. <br />The one important business which was discussed during that <br />meeting was a request by Mr. Foley to rezone his land tram on <br />Highway #10 from Residential R1 to General Business B3. Mr. <br />Stole read Mr. Dahlgren's report concerning Mr. Foley's appli- <br />cation wherein Mr. Dahlgren stated that the proposed plan for <br />the use of the land should be given to the council considering <br />the rezoning and in addition a better legal description of the <br />land also be .given. The council then decided that no action <br />should be taken until the Planning Commission meets at a formal <br />meeting and recommends action for this rezoning at that time. <br />Mr. Duane Meckola appeared before the council and presented <br />what he stated was a third application for a proposed subdivi- <br />sion of lots #29 and #30 at 'Ioodlawn and Hillview. It was stated <br />that there is a possibility t.at an avenue will run through <br />this block at the rear of this property line -..nd that the council <br />has made the policy of having all frontages face Uoodlawn or <br />the proposed new avenue. However, since Mr. Meckola is only <br />interested in subdividing an selling and selling the lots at <br />this time, the council decided that the application for the <br />subdivision would be correct and that the council would consider <br />the question of where the lots would front at the time that a <br />building permit for building on these lots are requested. The <br />council requested tkm and Hz. Meckola concurred that a 33 foot <br />dedication for a street at the rear of the lot which would sub- <br />divide the remainder of the lot into 2 lots would be given. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Flatz appeared before the council and requested <br />that the council deny Mr. Lind Permission to build on his lot <br />since the 110 feet sold to Mr. Lind by Mr. Stanley Dahlmeier <br />incroaches 15 feet onto their lot. In further questioning <br />Mr. Lind if was found that he was not the legal owner as yet <br />and that Mr. Stanley Dahlmeier still owns the lot which has not <br />as yet been subdivided. The council then concurred that the <br />village was not as yet involved in this problem insofar as Mr. <br />Lind has not applied for a building permit and is not the legal <br />owner. <br />Mr. Stole reported to the council that Mr. Arthur McClure <br />and Mrs. Phyllis Robertus had resigned from the Planning Com- <br />mission although nothing has been given in writing and that <br />Mr. Wendt, also a member, has not attended meetin' -s sinch March <br />of 1960. Hz. Stole stated that he feels that the Planning <br />Commission should have three now replacements. Mayor Crane <br />then stated that applications would be considered and action <br />taken thereon at the next mooring. <br />question of the proposed subdivision by Bronson Erickson <br />was brought to the attention of the council and 7:r. Christensen <br />stated that it would be resubmitted by Bronson Erickson in a <br />manner suggested by the Planning Commission. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.