My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Council_Minutes_1982_03_08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
Council_Minutes_1982_03_08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:54:39 AM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:26:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/8/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 8, 1982 <br />Regular Meeting Page Four <br />Bernita Chestek, 8161 Spring Lake Park Road. <br />stated she and her husband did not care to have <br />any more business in the area, and they would like <br />it to be kept residential. <br />Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened <br />the regular meeting at 8:00 PM. <br />Motion /Second: Forslund /Doty to deny the rezoning <br />and conditional use permit request Case No. 104 -82 submitted <br />by Gregory A. Johnson for the following reasons: <br />The members of the Council are all personally <br />familiar with the property in question and the <br />surrounding neighborhood and the fact that this <br />property abutts Highway 10; <br />That surrounding property owners had purchased <br />their properties in reliance on the present resi- <br />dential zoning of the subject property; <br />That if the property were rezoned as requested <br />it would be difficult and expensive to police the <br />use of the property, including business hours, <br />lighting, noise, and air pollution problems, <br />storage and housekeeping; <br />That previous zoning requests for the subject <br />property and other neighboring properties have been <br />heard and denied by the City; <br />That the Comprehensive Plan which has been <br />prepared and adopted by the City after years of <br />study, and at great expense to the taxpayers, <br />designates the subject property as medium density <br />residential and that the Council agrees with <br />maintaining that classification and wants the <br />subject property to remain consistent with said <br />Comprehensive Plan; <br />That the Council finds that the public health, <br />safety, and welfare would be adversely affected by <br />the granting of the request because of the adverse <br />effect it would have on the residential property <br />values of the abutting properties presently being <br />used as residential; <br />That the applicant has not shown what impact, <br />if any, the use would have on traffic and the <br />environment; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.