Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 22, 1983 <br />Regular Meeting Page Five <br />Director Johnson reviewed his memo of August 22 <br />to the Council, concerning the 1983 sealcoat and <br />street repairs. He presented an overhead map <br />of the City, showing the streets scheduled for <br />repair, and options available. <br />Motion /Second: Doty /Hankner to authorize the <br />Director of Public Works /Community Development to <br />let the bids for the seal coat program, with the <br />opening to be September 8, and including Longview <br />Road between Woodcrest and County Road H, and Red <br />Oak Drive between County Road H2 and County Road <br />H, as alternative possibilities for seal coating. <br />Funds are identified in the budget for 1983. Also, <br />Staff is authorized to complete by force account <br />with department personnel or by negotiated prices <br />with contractors the minor street repairs within <br />the project area up to a maximum of p $15,000. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />Director Johnson reviewed his memo of August 22 <br />to the Council concerning a consultant for review <br />of the Miller Industrial Park wetland data. <br />Acting Mayor Blanchard stated she felt a third <br />party was necessary to protect the integrity of <br />the wetland ordinance. <br />Motion /Second: Doty /Linke to allow Staff to <br />proceed with a working agreement with Braun <br />Engineering Testing, and develop a working <br />contract to have them study and review the existing <br />field data, supplement field data as necessary, <br />analyze existing soil and vegatative materials as <br />they relate to the wetland areas, analyze ground <br />water hydrologic conditions, establish or assess <br />near and long term impacts on site wetland charac- <br />teristics due to variances in hydrologic cycles and <br />existing man -made features, and recommend to the <br />City what, if any, changes can be considered <br />to the area regulated by the wetland ordinance, in <br />conjunction with the Miller Industrial Park, with the <br />cost not to exceed $5,000, with the funds to come <br />from the SF4M fund. <br />3 ayes 1 nay <br />Councilmember Hankner stated she had voted against <br />the motion as she felt that spending the money for <br />a consulting engineering firm may not be the best <br />use of the money when there are State professionals <br />available to the City to use. <br />15. Consideration <br />of Staff Memo <br />Regarding 1983 <br />Sealcoat Pro- <br />ject and Autho- <br />rization to <br />Advertise for <br />Bids <br />Motion Carried <br />16. Consideration <br />of Staff Memo <br />Regarding Hiring <br />a Consultant to <br />Review Wetland <br />Issued Raised <br />Per Miller <br />Industrial Park <br />Proposal <br />Motion Carried <br />