My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Council_Minutes_1984_03_26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Council_Minutes_1984_03_26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:54:53 AM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:27:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/26/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 26, 1984 <br />Regular Meeting Page Three <br />and project, and reviewed the proposed development. <br />Mayor McCarty inquired if any of the north side of the <br />project would touch the flood plain. Mr. Bolin <br />explained that the flood plain is at 902, and the <br />project will be between 903 and 903k when it is <br />finished. <br />Director Thatcher showed the existing drainage ditch <br />on the property, and reported it was John Johnson's <br />opinion that the ditch could be filled and there <br />would still be adequate storage. <br />Mr. Bolin presented a sketch of the flood plain area. <br />Alex Levitan, 2051 Long Lake Road, New Brighton, <br />asked what the rental range would be on the units. <br />Mayor McCarty explained to Mr. Levitan that Mr. <br />Anderson would not be required to answer that question <br />as it had no bearing on the purpose of the public <br />hearing. <br />Lucy Levitan, 2051 Long Lake Road, New Brighton, <br />asked if there would be common hallways in the <br />buildings, and what the development timetable <br />would be. <br />Mr. Bolin showed on their drawing where there would <br />be two separate entrances for each building, and <br />there would be no common hallways. <br />Mayor McCarty explained the Council would be dis- <br />cussing the development timetable after the public <br />hearing was concluded. <br />Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing at 7:50 PM. <br />Mayor McCarty reviewed that the applicant's request <br />is for approval of a planned unit development, <br />including a conditional use permit for the flood <br />plain excavation, a flood plain use petit and a <br />major subdivision. <br />Clerk /Administrator Pauley reminded the Council that <br />they had received Resolution No. 102 -84, from the <br />Planning Commission, recommending approval of the <br />development. <br />Mayor McCarty asked if the correspondence from the <br />Commissioner of the DNR is needed prior to approval. <br />City Attorney Meyers advised that if the Council <br />approves the project, the developer must enter into <br />a development agreement, with which he must meet <br />all the requirements, and that any motion made by <br />the Council would be contingent upon the applicant <br />entering into the development agreement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.