Council_Minutes_1985_12_09 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council December 9, 1985 Regular Meeting Page Four Councilmember Hankner voted against the motion, for the reasons she had stated earlier. Director Thatcher asked the Council's consideration 11. of Resolution No. 1961, granting final approval for Silver Lake Woods 2nd Addition. He explained the preliminary plat had been approved by the City Council on July 8, 1985 and Mary Anderson then sent it down to the County, and had just now received it back and was requesting final approval. Motion /Second: Quick /Hankner to approve Resolution No. 1961, approving the subdivision of lands to be known as Silver Lake Woods 2nd Addition, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Director Thatcher asked the Council's consideration of Resolution No. 1960, for the same reasons as given on the previous resolution. He noted the Council had approved the preliminary plat on April 22, 1985, but that Rice Creek Watershed District had not yet approved it, and recommended that approval be a condition of the resolution. 'lotion /Second: Haake /Hankner to approve Resolution No. 1960, approving the minor subdivision of lands to be known as Linda Grant Addition, and direct Staff to advise Mary Anderson Homes that no further approvals, including the issuance of development agreements, will be authorized by the Council without approval from Rice Creek Watershed District in advance, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Attorney Meyers reported that on March 25, 1985, the Council passed a motion, that subject to the City's rights of appeal, to comply with the order for judgement of the Ramsey County District Court relative to Court File No. 484143, granting Gregory A. Johnson's application for a rezoning of his property at 2865 Highway 10 from R -1 single family to B -3 commercial highway use with conditional use permit for highway auto repair and which conditional use permit for highway auto repair shall contain the following restric- tions: the erection and maintenance of a privacy fence as required by the Municipal Ordinance, the maintenace of the property in a reasonable clean condition, the ma of reasonable business hours for conducting his busin Iss, and the restricted use of lighting so as not to disturb the enjoyment of property by residential property owners. He explained that the Court of Appeals Report of Public Works/ Community Dvlpt. Director Motion Carried Motion Carried 12. Report of Attorney