Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />Mounds View City Council August 10, 1987 <br />Regular Meeting Page Five <br />Mayor Linke replied it is already planned. <br />Mr. Frits stated he lives near Hillview Park, where <br />there is a problem with people parking on the road <br />and dropping children off, and he asked if the Council <br />will be responsive to the needs of the people, which <br />have been expressed. <br />Mayor Linke replied there is no parking lot at Hillview <br />Park, other than during the winter, and the area Mr. <br />Frits mentioned is not to be used for parking. <br />Councilmember Hankner stated the Council had hoped to <br />be able to find the financial resources to be used for <br />alternate plans for the building, but the City is <br />facing severe budget cuts and the money is just not <br />available to move the building again. She stated the <br />Council had planned to do something for the citizens <br />as a whole, and not just for the immediate neighborhood. <br />She stated she personally cannot support any spending <br />of money that does not exist. <br />Mr. Frits suggested the City sell the building. <br />Councilmember Hankner expressed her frustration with <br />citizens who do not want to participate in anything <br />until after the fact, if they do not like it. She <br />stated she personally tried her best to get citizen <br />input, and the Council must weigh the property rights, <br />and she pointed out Random Park is City property, and <br />it does not belong to any particular individual, nor <br />is it there for their exclusive use. <br />Motion: Blanchard to reconsider placement of the Motion Failed <br />building. <br />The motion died for lack of a second. <br />Motion /Second: Wuori /Blanchard to approve Resolu- <br />tion No. 2224, approving the minor subdivision for <br />William R. Zwieg, 5309 Greenfield Avenue, and waive <br />the reading. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Attorney Meyers reported he had received an order <br />from the court for a dismissal with prejudice in <br />the Povlitzki case, and that is now considered <br />resolved. He added he has been presented with a <br />mutual releaso of all claims to resolve the matter <br />be,ween the Povlitzki's and Conroy's, regarding the <br />Muldoon's property. He added there is a quit claim <br />13. Approval of <br />Rslt. No. <br />2224 <br />Motion Carried <br />14. Report of <br />Attorney <br />