My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
_ _. - <br />_ �_ _ <br />� <br />.. . .� .. . ' - . d=:._��..'.��-.-�_ --.._ L <br />� �"�1. ">��_v._' �€�w-<^_�...��"`=_ �_.._u.n��s�_____" � __" " `. -_� �.._""_ . -.-..� .._.. . . :.: __'�'_.� _ <br />- ' __' - _ .. ' __�"_ . Ic <br />I" <br />� I <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting ' <br />February 4, 1998 <br />Page 5 <br />This is the reason that the Comprehensive Plan would have to be amended for the <br />Walgreen Development. <br />The Comprehensive Plan issues are: <br />1. What kind of buffer is the developer providi <br />2. Trai�ic impact, a 40 percent increase in tra� <br />3. Suitability for residential development. ; <br />4. The impac on the City's tax base. ' <br />5. Green space <br />The rezoning issues are: <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />The relationship to the Comprehensi <br />Surrounding developments, what a€�� <br />Demonstrated need for the dew�lc�pi-r <br />Grading issues ,,;:��� <br />Traffic impact, closing of�>�astwood <br />Crime impact :�:<;��" .:=>k��: <br />Commissioner Johnstoa <br />the st�iement made 1���.� �� <br />W�.l���cr� project �.�7rV��� il�Y�; <br />�xeny`4?a �� ���:r'p .��7J� Cr��;�;ii <br />The re��to�.���t�Il�1s. ICeyt�6 <br />the Wal�,°�:`;rt ���°oj�E;i wenc <br />.. .h� `, . ... ..... <br />ad <br />ked Mr. �urutingh�if there was any verification to back up <br />en that �a�r ���c���would fall in value by 15 percent if the <br />gh. IvT��: �"�.����ai�tgham declined to comment. <br />ive, stated that she had a realtor appraise her property. <br />property would decrease in value by 10 - 15 percent if <br />;�arren Jol►n����, '1'1'�f} (�reenwood Drive, asked the Commission who would be <br />responsible for the d��r�ase in value of his property if the Walgreen project is approved. <br />He asked the Commission to research this question and have some type of answer <br />available at the;ri�t meeting that involved the project. <br />��'�����u�u�.�n�►ner Obert sug;ested that the City use an independent real estate appraiser to <br />��^����� �'r��; �iroperties in question. <br />Associate Ericson stated that an independent appraiser was available for the City's use <br />and the City Attorney could be called in to answer questions of valuation impact that the <br />Walgreen project might have. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.