Laserfiche WebLink
i ..:i. <br />• " � � � � � • <br />^ � - • <br />Communiiy Developmeni Direcfor Sh�idon <br />indicated th�f we will n�ed to review n�w pians <br />i� de�ermine what the variance reques� is. <br />Cf�air Pefierson and Cammis�ianer �r�saemle <br />expressed their concems that ihis proposal did <br />noi meet ihe criteria for granting a variance. <br />ihe applicant indicated that they are seek�ng � <br />varianc� in order to add green space but th�4 <br />focating fihe building on the siie is workabfe <br />without a variance. <br />M�tion/Secand: �ras�emle/�ruok� to table thi� <br />item with no action to be taken before ih�ir <br />�epiember 4, 1996, meeting. <br />- � <br />�ommission�r Brasaemle infor°med t�e <br />resider�ts of the nexf plar�ning Commissio� <br />meeting dates of Wednesday, Augu�t 21 and <br />ihe regular meeting to be held on September 4, <br />1996. <br />Planning Associate Pruit# informed the <br />Commission thai she wotald be vdriting the <br />appiicant a letter requesting an additianal fi0 <br />days in order to process the application. <br />Community Develapmenfi Director Sheld�n <br />reviewed tF�is item indicating that the Mounds <br />View ordinance require� developmeni contracts <br />for a(most every st�p in th� d�veiopmer�t <br />pracess, wheiher fihe �t�p involves <br />improvements or not. Ii is st�ffs understanding <br />thaf #he purpose eaf the requirer�en� is fo ma�ce <br />sure ir��r�vements ar� cornplet�d. Si�e <br />rec�mm�nded th�t, for priva�e improvem�r�ts, a <br />better �pproach wc��ald be io all�w appli�r��s ta <br />proceed �rifihouf postir�g security. i�, at #he tirrte <br />� � ��* <br />"',�, `." <br />Mofiion Carried <br />7. Consideration of <br />Resofution No. <br />470-96 Regarding <br />Ordinance No. 5�8 <br />(Chapter 1006.06} <br />i '-': <br />I <br />�� <br />ii <br />