Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />Ms. Pamela Sheldon <br />Septe�nber $, 1996 <br />Page '�ao <br />i <br />f< I can see na reason why the a�proval o�' ti�e vaxiance would in any <br />way 1� materzally defiximental to the p�pose of the zoning cod� or to <br />other pro�erty ira the same aone. <br />g. The proposed vaz�iance will not impai� an adequate supply of light o� <br />air to the adjacent prop�.rtyo The porch woul.d be bareiy visibie to the..�.. <br />neig�bors direc�.ly behind my property, and only then through an existing <br />raw of matux'e tr2es and across their very deep backyards, making it <br />almos� invisible �o the neighl�oring home owners. Since the porch is <br />at the rear of my home, away �rotn the street, no congestian would occuro <br />There would be no increase zn the danger of fire or public safety since <br />the proposed porch is well away �rcm the neighboring homeso Having a <br />well designed and well buzlt porch would only add to the property values <br />wittzin the neighborhood, ,.:not d�minish or i.mpair themo <br />In closing, T appreciate the Planning Co�tnt�ission taking my request for <br />a variance into considerationo I trust that T have provided you wi�h <br />clear and accurate information as to why I feel that a deniai of my <br />request�would create an undue hardship, as well as a.prac�ical difficulty, <br />in the ftit�e use and enjoyment of my home and praperty. <br />Shouldl you desire further informa�.ian or clarzfication, pleas� fee� free <br />to con�act me. <br />` � Sincerely, <br />Ronald Lo Gardner <br />t�iyLo-�-o° <br />