Laserfiche WebLink
Plannin� Commission Report <br />Silverview Esiates PUD Development Review and Preliminary Plat <br />- November 19, 1997 <br />Page 3 <br />' ,� <br />i <br />! �� � �•� <br />The building area allowed in the PUD General Concept Plan for the senior housing <br />component is 84,000 square feet ma.�cimum. The architeciural site sheet 1 of 1 indicates <br />ihat the buitding area for the senior housing is to be 115,800. The original building <br />%otprint af �4,a00 was ihe result of the scaling of the building ort �he concept plan <br />drawing. However, the buiiding footprint has not changed since concept pian stage. <br />Therefore, r�gardiess of the number o� square feet, the building mass and general design <br />hav� not changed This modification wiIi require an amendment to the PtJD resoIutio� <br />thai was approved on May 2i. Ti�is will be done prior to City Cauncil action. <br />The agnounis and percentages of pervious and impervious surfaces shown on the site plans <br />for each of the lats within the PI7I� are inaccueate. �he appticani has submitted corrected <br />data a5 follows and will revise the site plans prior to City Council action. <br />Pe�i�us / Iffip��ious A���� <br />I,ot No. 'Total Area in Pervious Area in Impervious I�irea in <br />Square Feet �quare Feet (%) �quare Feet (%} <br />i. 70,646 12,851 (18.2) 57,795 (81.8) <br />2. 92,587 3Q,0�1 (32.5) 62,506 {67.5) <br />3. 48,000 35,990 {75.0) 12,010 (25.0} <br />4, 3 55,984 298,827 (�3.9) 57,157 (16,1} <br />�9/ jP''ll�t(�'V�lD�35 <br />� s����,v rD�� <br />(�g'!o <br />� Building heights are mislabeled on the laiest submissian far the praposed Holiday <br />Stationstore. The applicant will correct thes� drawings to reflect accurate heights prior to <br />City Council aciion. <br />e In the most receni su�mittal there was no detail provided on the propased canopy over the <br />pump islands at the Holiday Stationstore. The applicant has submitted reievani detail for <br />the canopy that shows height, materials and proposed signing. This information will b� <br />available to the Commission on the 19th. <br />� The site �lan sheet reflects a parking Iot setiback of 30 feet as required, but the label <br />indica�ing 10' setbacic has not been removed Th� applicant has been advised and will <br />make the necessary change to the site pla�. <br />� The landscaping plan did noi originaliy iden�ify plant material by size and type ar►d did not <br />indicate the extent af exisiing trees on site Yo b� preserved. The revised submittaI incIude� <br />- the required piant raaaterial information, and �he applican� wilI provide a label far the areas <br />shown as e�sting vegetation that vdrill read "plani material to be maintained." <br />