Laserfiche WebLink
P1aQning Commission Re�oort <br />5ilver Lake Corr�ons Development Review <br />Plxnniug Case No. 4�7-97 <br />June 18, 1997 <br />Page 4 <br />If flowering �rabapple trees are to be used, th� species should not b� either sparki�r or <br />radiartt which are s�asceptible to disease. (The proposed species on the revised plan is <br />Spring Sno� Crabappte.} <br />Pin oalcs should be changed io red oak or bicoior oak. <br />Regal elm (on revised pIa.n) shoeald be chan�ed ta Hackberry. <br />Stai� has a number of concer�s with �he ptantings proposed ort the site, which are described belaw. <br />We will have a diagram at the meeting to illus�rate how we feel the plan needs to be revised. <br />t�rborvitae edge along Highway 10 was intended to screen the view of the parking Iot from <br />th� highway, but it is not very well anchored alon� the frontage. {Iis position appears to be <br />random and not well�related to the buiid�ng frontage.) 5taff suggests that a grove of trees <br />be planted beiw�en the tvvo e�isting apartmeni buildiz�gs on ei�h�r side of the �valkway to <br />�et the same effect_ Plantings of spruc� and crabapple sho�ald then b� plar�ted on either end <br />o�the Highway 10 frontage ac�d on either side of the driveway, to create "6rackets" for that <br />frontage and ideniity for the project. <br />The iilacs along the south half of the I-�i�hway 20 frontage were intended as screening, b�a� <br />siaff is concemed that they will grow so high, ihey will apppear to create a walied <br />"compound" look ta the development. 'UVe would suggest lower growing, dense shrubs that `' <br />would provide an edge, keep childrer� off the highway, but a.lsa heautify �he site. The twa <br />blue spruce in the center wauld be moved, and additional trees added in groupings at either <br />end of the frontage. We r�ill be asking the City Forester for some suggestions on types of <br />shrubs wlxich will do well in this confined space. <br />There needs to be some type of fencing aIong the Highway 10 edge where it ahuts the <br />existing apartment buildings. �Ie have been ta.11dng with the applicant abaui �he overaIi <br />Highway 10 design therzke, and that we expect it to include a bike path and fencing. vVe <br />have also talked with MnDOT about entering into a iicense agreemenfi to allow us� of some <br />of the lughway right�of-way. They appear receptive. We are trying to avoid the situation <br />where we require fencing from the applicant and then later have the City ir�stall fencing as <br />part af the Highway 10 design therne. Staff continues to be concemed, however, that <br />fencing is needed along this stretch bec�use oi the number of chiidren in the existing <br />apartmenis and the frequent occasions when ciuldren are observed playing in the front Iaw�x <br />area with rao separation �om Highway 1Q. <br />The wood fence along the back property 1°uie needs to be e�ended further toward <br />Fastwood to screer� the four parking spaces nexi to the 4-ur�a building. <br />The arborvitae edge along th� chaira link fence needs �io be anchored an either end with <br />crabapple trees, or a combination of crabapple and spruce. Th� City Forester has said tl�at <br />the species proposed is suitabl� for cre�tin� � hed�e effect a.�d for providing screening. <br />