Laserfiche WebLink
- 15 - <br />2) Relevant capacity measure (iniles of trail, number. �""' <br />of tables, feet of beach, etc.) .� . <br />3) Parking capacity on-site <br />]t. Adjacent land uses . - <br />1) What are they <br />2) Positive, negative effect on use o£ facilities <br />3: Planned local areas <br />a. Name of facility .(number or intersection designation will <br />do if nu name has been fleci.ded) <br />b. Proposed ClassificaEion (Table 1, Recreation Open Space <br />Development Guide/POlicy 21an, see Appendix T). <br />c. Ownership/Administration <br />d. Approximate Location {map) � <br />e. Proposed Size (acreaqe estimate) , „ <br />4. Examples of protecti.on open space areas t:hat h�ve xecxeati,onal <br />value are� <br />a, Stream corridors are well-suited for r.rail development be- <br />cause of scenic value and their unsultability for develop- ' <br />ment which poses flood =isksand poLenti�al impacts on runoff. <br />rates. <br />b. Lakeshore parcels could be reserved for publib recreational <br />use to enhance adjacent property values and quality of <br />life in the nearby area, while eaeing the lakeshore-de•� <br />velopment runoff 6urdene that degrade many urban lakes and <br />pxoviding ecological and aesthetic benefits. <br />c. Wetlands woodlands, and steea sloaes have scenic value <br />when included in parks, and prorecting them from development <br />prevents erosion and runoff problems (on alopes and wood- <br />lnnds) and floodi�tg, water quality and groundwater pxoblems <br />(in wctl.unds) . <br />d. Seasonally �aet soils and shallow bedrock are expensive to <br />develop and service, and are better suited ior non-construc- <br />tion land uses like recreation. , <br />�� <br />f: <br />..� <br />