My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1979-08-23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1979
>
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1979-08-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2022 11:55:52 AM
Creation date
9/5/2014 9:24:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
:'ir1:ICY dOR k'},dS hNU CI:A?f,F;S <br />./'4 i <br />III. PROS AND COTS <br />Arguments for: <br />1. People tend to appreciate things more if thcy are rc- <br />quired to pay for them. <br />2. Charging sir�plifies control and discipline. <br />3. Charging makes it possible to expand facilitics� pro- <br />grams and services. <br />4. The public should not be asked to mcet the r_nt?re cost <br />of providing activities and £ac.ilitics that invclve con- <br />sidcrable expense and serve relatively few. <br />5. The willingness o£ the public to p:�y for certain forms <br />of recreation £urnishes the authoritics a guide in pro- <br />�gram planning, _ ' <br />Arguments against: <br />1. Recreation is a basic human need and�, in the public <br />interest, should be provided on the sa�ne basis of finan- <br />� cial supuort as education and health service, <br />2. Charging tends to exclude from the program persons who <br />need it most. <br />3. Charging stimnlates the development of services and <br />facilities which bring in revenue instead of programs <br />which are of greater value and importance. <br />4. The tendency to charge fees and the attarpt to make <br />-recreation self-supporting incrcese the difficulty of <br />securing adequate tax support. <br />C. Other factors: <br />1. As cities use £ees and charges as a source of revenve� <br />there�is a danger that the amount of money received <br />will be used to judge the success of park facilities <br />��and recreational programs. ' <br />2. Serious chances are taken of losinq tax support when we <br />talk mnch oP,self-sUpport and give the impression t)iat <br />a way has been.£ound.of carrying recreation �•!ithout tax <br />funds. - <br />IV. EXISTING G+ARGE PATTERNS <br />A. The majority of Qark and recreation agenci.es only charge for <br />use o£ specialized facilities� special accommodations� and <br />program services that entail c�pense aUove the noimal eost <br />of operation. In general, chalges are made from Lhe fol- <br />lowing categories of service: - <br />1. Special features and facilit.ics, includi»g use of oolf <br />courses, swim-ning beeches and pc+ols, L�oating faeilitir3.� <br />bath houses, tennis courts, picnic acco�mnodations, game <br />areas, bowling greens, etc. � . <br />2. Eaclusive occupancy (rental)� includiny exclusive tise <br />by individuals or grouys of clubrooms, auditoriums, g��m- <br />nasiums, swi�vning puols, stadfa, ind t:he like. (Se� <br />Facilities Use Policy) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.