COMMISSION_MINUTES_1980-03-27 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MOUNDS VIEV PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Page'2-"-'-'--'-'-'°------'---°----°--------------^'-------"----MSrch_1�j_1:�80 thatrperson Mountin noted the memo dated 3/19/80 rogardfng the proposed Lase Revlew format. She asked that the Canmission consider use of [he format. Haakr: moved to remove Item #6 fran [he table. Seconded by Burmeister. 7 ayes 0 nays Official Rose �n[roduced the item as an additional step review requested by the Applfcant and desired by�the tity for thetr proDOSed P.U.D. development. 7his step was felt to be advantageous, due to the Lity's developmen[ of a community park and the Applicant's interest in developing an approximate 100 acre parcel. The parcel in question and under review is basicly bounded by Long Lake Road, County Road H2, Silver Lake Road and County Road I. The City's exis[Ing zonfng of the area Is a canbtnatfon of R-1, R-2, R-4 and I-1. The Canprehensive Plen designates the area mixed P.U.D. to tnclude Cammerciel, Publtc and Residential. The Applicant, in his letter to you dated 1/9/B0, has pro- posed such a sketch proposal. He Ms also listed five poin[s of concern, which he would lfke the City to ayree with or glve him some direction with which he can use to start his P.U.D. proeess. Staff recammends that you comment on his five points of concern and further, give him direction with regard to any additional specifl cs you mlght recaanend be Dncorporated in his P.U.D. planning pr�cess. This recammenda[ton that the P Unning Cammission m!ght make does not short-circuit the three step P.U.D. process, but only becanes a vantage point for both the Lity and the Applicant. The vantage for the City would be to canplete the park relocatlon swap, purchase and dedication process and for the Applicant, the, direction necessary for him to start hls P.U.D. process. �lazer suted he felt the process was befng cut short. Suggested that the Appl�cant start at the Concept Slage of the P.U.D. process. Official Rose assured him that there was no shart cut of the V.U.D. process. Park Dfrector Anderson gave a brief overview of his staff memo dated March 17, 1980. Mr. Anderson stated that the iarks and Mcreation Commlsston had been study(n9 and re- vlewing the Sllver Ylew ►ark Issua s(nce Auyust, i976. It w�s tbe consansus of th� Park Commiss:on thst the re- loution proposal as pres�nted would be e bene(it to both tb� dweloper and th� City. And�rton further stated th�t tb� wrrent park propoal w�s �rrived �t following t8 months of canpran�u and neqotlation with both thc Park 6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEVAL P.U.D.