My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-2018
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
03-21-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2022 1:49:30 PM
Creation date
1/12/2015 3:40:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV EDC
EDC Document Type
Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EDC Minutes <br /> February 15,2008 Not Approved <br /> Page 4 <br /> • C. Discuss Business Improvement Partnership Loan Program Interest Rate <br /> Ms. Steinmetz mentioned that this item is a continuation of previous EDA discussions <br /> regarding the draft Mounds View Business Toolbox document. The EDA asked for the <br /> EDC's input regarding the Loan Program's current interest rate of 2%. <br /> Commissioner Johnson asked about the typical rate of a business loan. Chair Helgemoe <br /> responded that it depends on what the borrower is trying to finance, but if the loan is a five- <br /> year equipment loan, the rate will probably be between 6.5 to 7%, however interest rates <br /> also depend on the borrower's risk rating. He also completed some research by talking to a <br /> collegue who used to work for the Cities of Oakdale and Roseville and reported that most <br /> cities charge between 2 and 6% for loans between $25,000 and $50,000. <br /> Commissioner Johnson asked why we would raise the interest rate if the loan program isn't <br /> being used. Ms. Steinmetz answered that the most recent loan request from The Station <br /> was retracted by the applicant, which prompted this discussion. She added that she is <br /> unsure if the policy issue of offering financial incentives to businesses is the EDA's <br /> overarching concern. <br /> Commissioner Wagner asked if this program is being marketed. Ms. Steinmetz explained <br /> that none of the City's financial programs are being marketed due to the EDA's wishes. <br /> The EDC further discussed the 2% rate and the consensus was that it should cover the <br /> costs to administer the loan and that the rate should be reviewed annually. <br /> • Commissioner Belting left the meeting. <br /> D. Finalize 2008 EDC Priorities <br /> Ms. Steinmetz displayed the reformatted and reordered 2008 EDC Priorities, which were <br /> based on the EDC's January 18, 2008 discussion and the 2007 priorities. The EDC's <br /> consensus was that the priorities as listed on the screen are what they discussed on <br /> January 18th. Staff recommended that the EDC formally adopt the 2008 Priorities and that <br /> she will report them to the EDA. <br /> Motion/Second: Commissioner Johnson moved and Commissioner Meehlhause seconded <br /> the approval of the 2008 EDC Priorities. <br /> Motion Carried: 5 Ayes 0 Nays <br /> E. Review Economic Development Component of Comprehensive Plan <br /> Since the EDC's input regarding the Economic Development portion of the Comprehensive <br /> Plan has not changed for two months, Ms. Steinmetz suggested that Commissioner <br /> Meehlhause, who serves on the Comprehensive Plan Task Force, and herself provide the <br /> EDC's input thus far to the Task Force on March 12th. The EDC agreed that Commissioner <br /> Meehlhause would do a great job representing the EDC at the March 12th meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.