Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 24, 2014 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />E. Resolution 8230, Authorizing Barr Engineering to Perform Phase 1 Sediment <br />Sampling for Silver View Pond. <br /> <br />Public Works Director DeBar stated as a requirement of the City’s MS4 permit, the City had to <br />manage, operate and maintain its stormwater system in a manner that reduced discharged <br />pollutants to the maximum extent practical. He reported Silver View Pond was excavated in <br />1982 to accommodate stormwater management or a 146-acre development. This pond has three <br />distinct arms and, over the years, the permanent storage area has filled with sediment. <br /> <br />Public Works Director DeBar indicated the MPCA recommends that stormwater ponds be <br />evaluated for sediment removal when the pond volume is reduced to 50%. This occurs roughly <br />once every 30 years. He indicated the Council authorized Barr Engineering to complete a <br />sediment survey in 2012. At that time, Barr Engineering determined that Silver View Pond was <br />38% full of sediment. Staff briefly discussed the estimated expense for the dredging of Silver <br />View Pond and recommended the Council authorize Barr Engineering to perform the Phase 1 <br />Sediment sampling. He explained the City had funds available to cover the expense of the <br />sampling. He reported that after the testing was completed, the Council could evaluate when the <br />pond would need to be dredged and could apply for grants to assist with the expense. <br /> <br />Council Member Mueller questioned what information the City would gather from the testing <br />results and asked how long test results would stand. Public Works Director DeBar explained the <br />test results would provide the Council with information on the type and classification of the <br />sediment in the pond. Staff further discussed the benefits of knowing the classification of the <br />sediment within Silver View Pond noting the expense for dredging would also be greater <br />understood. He believed that based on past experience with the PCA, the samples taken in 2014 <br />could be used for future dredging. <br /> <br />Mayor Flaherty inquired what information Barr Engineering would provide the City from the <br />samples. Public Works Director DeBar indicated the report from Barr Engineering would <br />explain where the samples were taken from the pond, an estimation of when the pond should be <br />dredged, a cost estimate for dredging, and what future work may be required on the pond. <br /> <br />Mayor Flaherty expressed frustration with the 21% increase in the expense for the sample testing. <br />He requested staff speak with Barr Engineering regarding this matter. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause asked if the amount of sediment within the pond affected the <br />expense of the dredging. Public Works Director DeBar reported there was a direct correlation <br />between the amount of sediment that would need to be removed and the expense. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause stated the $1-$2 million expense for dredging this pond was a huge <br />expense given the fact the City only has a $5 million yearly budget. Public Works Director <br />DeBar explained that the information gathered from the samples would assist the City in