My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2015/09/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
Agenda Packets - 2015/09/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:03 PM
Creation date
6/19/2018 5:10:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/14/2015
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/14/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2. Experience performing similar sized studies. <br />3. Work plan for completing the study. <br />4. Staff to be assigned to the project including experience, training and work biography. <br />5. Name, address and contact information for 3 references where similar study work has <br />been completed. <br />6. Proposed project schedule. <br /> <br />VIII. EVALUATION: <br />Proposals will be evaluated based on the following: <br />1. Understanding of the project. <br />2. Experience in completing similarly sized projects. <br />3. Work plan for completing the study. <br />4. Qualifications/experience of personnel involved in the project. <br />5. References. <br />6. Cost of services. <br /> <br />IX. SELECTION: <br />Selection of a consultant for this project will be based on the criteria noted above. Upon <br />initial ranking of the respondent’s proposals, City will enter into negotiations with the <br />selected consultant to finalize the work plan. Should the City and the selected Consultant fail <br />to satisfactorily reach agreement as to the work plan including budget, the City may enter <br />into negotiations with the respondent judged second in the evaluation process.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.