My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2012/05/29
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
Agenda Packets - 2012/05/29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:12 PM
Creation date
6/26/2018 2:55:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/29/2012
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/29/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council April 9, 2012 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />Council Member Gunn questioned if the EDA should regulate these funds. 1 <br /> 2 <br />City Administrator Ericson felt the amendment language change worked. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Mayor Flaherty explained “The Mermaid Convention Center” was stricken from the Resolution. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Council Member Stigney questioned if the City should be promoting an event that is taking place 7 <br />at The Mermaid, a for-profit entity. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Council Member Gunn stated these were grant funds and were being used to promote an event in 10 <br />the community and to increase attendance at the event. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Mayor Flaherty indicated the grant had to be used in a specific manner and questioned if the 13 <br />Back to the 50’s event qualified as an event. City Administrator Ericson reiterated that the funds 14 <br />are to be used to promote or advertise the event. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Council Member Gunn explained if the funds were not used in the proper manner, Twin Cities 17 <br />Gateway may reduce the funds allotted to the City. 18 <br /> 19 <br />City Administrator Ericson stated 100% of the funding could be donated to Festival in the Park if 20 <br />the Council was apprehensive about allocating a portion to the Minnesota Street Rod 21 <br />Association’s event. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned what would happen with the funds if they were not expended. City 24 <br />Administrator Ericson was uncertain. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Mayor Flaherty did not oppose assisting with the Street Rod Association event. He wanted to 27 <br />make the public and neighboring communities aware of the event. He requested the Council take 28 <br />a vote on the amendment. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Council Member Stigney suggested the other local businesses be made aware of the opportunities 31 <br />to draw people into Mounds View on this evening so as not to only allow The Mermaid to 32 <br />benefit from the traffic. 33 <br /> 34 <br />AMENDMENT VOTE: 35 <br /> 36 <br /> Ayes – 2 Nays – 3 (Stigney, Hull and Flaherty) Motion to amend failed. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Council Member Mueller expressed concern about awarding grant funds to a private for-profit 39 <br />business with the Resolution as it was worded. She suggested the Resolution be amended to 40 <br />donate all the funds to Festival in the Park. She explained the Festival in the Park Committee 41 <br />was a non-profit organization and would follow the grant fund requirements. 42 <br /> 43 <br />SECOND AMENDMENT: Mueller/Stigney. Amending the Resolution awarding 100% of the 44 <br />Twin Cities Gateway 2012 Grant to Festival in the Park. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.