Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2011 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Mueller. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7829, 2 <br />Authorizing Step Increases for Police Officer Andrew Olson, Accountant Agnes Quasabart, and 3 <br />Public Service Officer Craig Swalchick. 4 <br /> 5 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 6 <br /> 7 <br />D. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 864, an Ordinance Revising 8 <br />Chapter 1008 of the Mounds View City Code relating to Dynamic Display 9 <br />Signs. 10 <br /> 11 <br />City Administrator Ericson stated this item was being brought before the Council for First 12 <br />Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 864 which revised Mounds View City Code relating 13 <br />Dynamic Display Signs. The hold time was causing public safety concerns and was addressed in 14 <br />the Ordinance, reducing the hold time for off-premises signs from 15 seconds to eight seconds. 15 <br />For on-premise signs, the hold time was being reduced from 10 seconds to three seconds. 16 <br />Additional revisions were reviewed in detail with the Council. 17 <br /> 18 <br />City Administrator Ericson reviewed a change to Subdivision 9 and discussed the preferred 19 <br />language. In addition, Staff reviewed the sign face conversion requirements and recommended 20 <br />the Council limit dynamic display signs to the 35W corridor. He explained the City Attorney 21 <br />had reviewed the Ordinance and Staff recommended the Council approve the first reading of 22 <br />Ordinance 864. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Council Member Mueller questioned Staff regarding the two faced sign that fronts 35W near 25 <br />Program Avenue. She expressed concern that the north facing size would interfere with the 26 <br />adjacent neighborhood if it became a dynamic sign. City Administrator Ericson stated a 27 <br />minimum requirement could be added to the Ordinance to ensure there was a minimum 28 <br />separation from the adjacent neighborhood. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Brian Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, suggested the dynamic signs not be allowed to carry 31 <br />messages through on separate panels. This could be a public safety issue. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Tom McCarver, Clear Channel Outdoor, stated signs along 35W could have sequential 34 <br />messaging and this language could be forwarded to City staff to be added to the Ordinance. He 35 <br />added that he would be more than happy to measure the distance of the north facing billboard 36 <br />close to the manufactured home park. 37 <br /> 38 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Approve the First Reading and of Ordinance 864, an 39 <br />Ordinance Revising Chapter 1008 of the Mounds View City Code relating to Dynamic Display 40 <br />Signs. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Council Member Stigney requested several language changes on the Ordinance. In addition, he 43 <br />suggested signs that malfunction be made to go dark. Mr. McCarver discussed with the Council 44 <br />how the signs are controlled remotely and stated upon notification a sign could be made dark. 45