Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 24, 2011 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />Approving an Amendment to the Billboard Lease on Medtronic Property. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Council Member Stigney had several comments on the lease agreement and advised Staff to 3 <br />make a number of corrections. He did not feel the share of profits was being divided properly 4 <br />and for this reason would not support the motion. 5 <br /> 6 <br /> Ayes – 3 Nays – 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Council Member Gunn recommended a portion of the revenues gained by this billboard be 9 <br />earmarked for the City’s new canine unit. Finance Director Beer indicated this would not be 10 <br />necessary as the Council has placed the item into the 2012 budget and funds would be allotted for 11 <br />the canine unit. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mayor Flaherty indicated the Council has discussed the canine unit at a work session and did not 14 <br />feel a funding mechanism should be decided this evening. City Administrator Ericson suggested 15 <br />this be discussed at a future meeting with a formal Resolution. He indicated the Police Chief was 16 <br />prepared to bring a Resolution to the Council at their November 14th meeting. 17 <br /> 18 <br />E. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 864, an Ordinance Amending 19 <br />Chapter 1008 of the Mounds View Municipal Code regarding Dynamic 20 <br />Display Signs. 21 <br /> 22 <br />City Administrator Ericson indicated the first reading of this Ordinance was completed on 23 <br />September 26th. He explained the hold time for on-site dynamic signs within City Code was set 24 <br />at ten seconds and it was recommended the hold time be reduced to four seconds. Another 25 <br />discussion point for consideration was the brightness of dynamic display signs. He 26 <br />recommended 500 nits at night and 7500 nits during the day. The night display was more of a 27 <br />concern than during daytime hours. 28 <br /> 29 <br />City Administrator Ericson stated that dynamic display billboards would only be located along 30 <br />the 35W corridor and would need to be 1,000 feet from any residential neighborhood. This 31 <br />would ensure that no single family homes would be viewing the glow of a dynamic display 32 <br />billboard. The differences between onsite and offsite display signs were discussed He indicated 33 <br />the use of dynamic displays signs at churches, schools, or businesses within a residential district 34 <br />would be required to have amber light. Staff recommended approval of the Ordinance revising 35 <br />Chapter 1008 of the Mounds View Municipal Code regarding dynamic display signs. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Council Member Hull felt the use of a dynamic display sign at neighborhood businesses could be 38 <br />disruptive to the adjacent neighborhood. City Administrator Ericson commented the dynamic 39 <br />displays in neighborhoods could be addressed separately through a Zoning Code amendment. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mr. McCarver stated the 1,000 foot requirement from a residential neighborhood could affect the 42 <br />north face of the billboard on Program Avenue. He indicated the south side of the billboard 43 <br />could be converted without affecting the residential district. 44 <br /> 45