Agenda Packets - 1977/07/14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

O' ivE pR Page 9 . June 23, 1997 Mounds View City Council 1 Council members Trude and Quick accepted this change as a friendly amendment to their motion. 2 3 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 4 5 Attorney Long explained that if the kitchen issue could not wait until the July 14th Council meeting,the council 6 should authorize staff to seek competitive proposals in an amount not to exceed$25,000 and to authorize the 7 Mayor and the City Administrator to enter into a contract with the lowest proposal. 8 9 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Quick to authorize staff to seek competitive proposals for the work to be done in 10 the kitchen at the Bel Rae,in an amount not to exceed$25,000 and to authorize the Mayor and the Clerk 11 Administrator,or their designee to enter into a contract authorizing the work to be done. 12 13 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 14 15 E. Resolution No.5134,on City of Mounds View's Position Regarding a County Jail in Shoreview. 16 17 Mr.Whiting read Resolution No.5134. 18 19 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to Approve Resolution No.5134,on City of Mounds View's Position 20 Regarding a County Jail in Shoreview. . 21 22 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 23 24 F. Consideration of Approving Resolution No.5141 of Project Management Services Agreement with 25 WAI Continuum for the Development of the Community Center. 26 27 Ms.Bennett explained that at the suggestion of Attorney Long,WAI Continuum was asked to draft an 28 agreement for Project Management Services to assist in providing guidance during the construction of the Bel 29 Rae Community Center. Their proposal is that it would cost between$30,000 and$45,000 for these services. 30 Ms.Bennett explained that Mr.Whiting and herself would work closely with WAI representatives to minimise 31 the amount of time they would spend on the project. Mr.Whiting explained that both Ms.Bennett and 32 himself expect during the construction of the project,to experience some questions that go beyond their scope 33 of expertise as well as the problems associated with time restraints 34 in dealing with the details of a project such as this. 35 36 Council member Trude noted that the City is currently paying the architect a 7%fee to oversee the project. She 37 wondered if any of these costs would be covered by his service fees. Ms.Bennett explained that the items 38 covered under the project management contract with WAI would be those that go beyond the scope of the plans 39 and specifications for the architectural contract agreement. She feels that WAI is likely to detect problems 40 that an outside company would not be able to pick up. Therefore,it will be less costly to the city in the long 41 run. The contract would be similar to the Attorney contract with the city and WAI services would only be used 42 upon city request. 43 44 Attorney Long noted that the city would be have the authority to cancel the contract at any time. 45 46 Acting Mayor Koopmeiners asked where the money would be coming from to pay for these services. • 47 Mr.Whiting noted that it would be coming from the$3.3 million that has been set aside for the Bel Rae 48 project.