Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 25, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7686, 2 <br />Approving the Interior Improvements for the Mounds View Community Center. 3 <br /> 4 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 5 <br /> 6 <br />E. Resolution 7693, Approving a Non-Standard Street Design for Jackson Drive 7 <br />in Area D of the Street and Utility Improvement Program. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Public Works Director DeBar stated that the Street and Utilities Task Force developed street 10 <br />standards for use in the Street and Utility Improvement Program. The Streets and Utilities 11 <br />Committee reviews and provides recommendations to the City Council for non-standard street 12 <br />and financing issues encountered during implementation of the Program. The Committee 13 <br />reviewed non-standard street design and specific needs issues and considerations for Area D of 14 <br />the Program at their August 16, September 20, and October 18 meetings this year. Staff reviewed 15 <br />the comments made by property owners regarding Jackson Drive being a non-standard street. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Public Works Director DeBar indicated Bonestroo and City staff developed design and costs 18 <br />options and presented them to the Committee at their August meeting. The Committee decided to 19 <br />move forward with two options. One option (Alternate B) was the standard 28-foot wide street. 20 <br />However, since State-Aid standards apply, there could be no parking on this street width. The 21 <br />second option (Alternate A) was to add a parking lane to one side adding an additional 4-feet to a 22 <br />total width of 32-feet. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Public Works Director DeBar explained from an engineering standpoint, both options are 25 <br />feasible. The 32-foot width is approximately $40,000 more to construct mainly due to the 26 <br />additional width. From a practicality standpoint, restricting parking at all times on a residential 27 <br />street is not typical and will adversely affect resident’s ability to have garage sales, graduation 28 <br />parties, etc. In addition, many of the comments in favor of Alternate B were based more on 29 <br />speeding and overflow parking issues from Lambert Park, rather than the lack of need for 30 <br />parking. A proposal for dedicated on-street parking at Lambert Park is being developed and will 31 <br />be considered by the Council at a future time. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Public Works Director DeBar stated the feedback results were discussed at the October 34 <br />Committee meeting. The Committee ultimately recommended (5-1) in favor of Alternate A (32-35 <br />foot wide with parking lane). Furthermore, the Committee recommends having the parking lane 36 <br />on the east side between County Road H2 and Bronson, and on the west side between Bronson 37 <br />and Groberg Street. This was recommended since Lambert Park and fewer properties exist on the 38 <br />east side (south of Bronson), and since only apartment buildings exist on the west side (north of 39 <br />Bronson). City staff and Bonestroo confer with this recommendation. Staff recommends that the 40 <br />City Council consider adopting Resolution 7693 approving a 32-foot wide street design for 41 <br />Jackson Drive with parallel parking on the east side between County Road H2 and Bronson 42 <br />Drive, and parallel parking on the west side between Bronson Drive and Groberg Street. 43 <br /> 44