Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 25, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br />Council Member Hull indicated he spoke with a resident in favor of Alternate B with no 1 <br />additional parking lane. Public Works Director DeBar indicated all streets have to allow for 2 <br />parking, especially State-Aid streets. A minimal standard may have to be created by the Streets 3 <br />and Utilities Committee. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Council Member Mueller questioned if the parking lane could be used as a trail for pedestrian 6 <br />traffic and bicycles. Public Works Director DeBar explained the parking lane would not be a 7 <br />designated trail but pedestrian traffic could be in this area. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Council Member Mueller asked if there would be two hour parking near the apartment complex. 10 <br />Public Works Director DeBar indicated this has not been discussed by the Streets and Utilities 11 <br />Committee. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Jim Battin, Streets and Utilities Committee member, explained the Area D street improvement 14 <br />program was below the limits for Rice Creek Watershed impervious surface requirements. He 15 <br />indicated that a future joint meeting with the Park and Rec Committee to discuss the parking lot 16 <br />situation at Lambert Park. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Public Works Director DeBar noted several homes along Jackson Drive have extremely short 19 <br />driveways. The City does not want to negatively impact any property with the improvements and 20 <br />may have to put a bend in the road to assure that this does not occur. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned if Jackson Drive was posted no parking at this time. Public Works 23 <br />Director DeBar stated the road was only posted “No Parking” near the park. 24 <br /> 25 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Mueller. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7693, 26 <br />Approving a Non-Standard Street Design for Jackson Drive in Area D of the Street and Utility 27 <br />Improvement Program. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Council Member Hull stated he was in favor of Alternate B, as this was the recommendation 30 <br />from the majority of the residents. 31 <br /> 32 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1 (Hull) Motion carried. 33 <br /> 34 <br />F. Resolution 7694, Approving the Construction of a Concrete Sidewalk along 35 <br />County Road H2 Between County Road 10 and Jackson Drive with Area D 36 <br />of the Street and Utility Improvement Program. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Public Works Director DeBar stated that the Street and Utilities Task Force developed street 39 <br />standards for use in the Street and Utility Improvement Program. He indicated the Sidewalk & 40 <br />Trailway Plan approved with the Comprehensive Plan identifies County Road H2 as a future 41 <br />pedestrian/bicycle corridor. Since Area D of the Program includes reconstruction of St. Stephen 42 <br />Street, Pinewood Court, and Jackson Drive, there is an opportunity to construct a portion of this 43 <br />proposed sidewalk with the Area D project. In addition, storm sewer is required to be extended 44 <br />from Jackson Drive to Pinewood Court to provide better drainage from the court. The storm 45