Agenda Packets - 2010/11/08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council October 11, 2010 Regular Meeting Page 9 1 H. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 854, an Ordinance Amending 2 Chapter 515 of the Mounds View City Code about the Licensing of Tattoo 3 and Body Art Establishments. 4 5 City Administrator Ericson stated that during the last legislative session, a new law was adopted 6 to regulate body piercing and other body modification services (comprehensively referred to as 7 “body art” establishments) in Minnesota. Mounds View has had provisions regulating these 8 businesses since 2000, when the City Council adopted Ordinance 663. No such business ever 9 located in the community, although there have been a few inquiries over the years. 10 11 City Administrator Ericson noted the Council reviewed the proposed revisions at their work 12 session meeting on September 7, 2010 and was generally supportive of the changes. On 13 September 27, 2010, the Council approved the first reading and introduction of the ordinance. 14 No changes or revisions have been made from the version presented September 27th. Staff 15 recommends approval of the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 854. 16 17 MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Waive the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance 854, 18 an Ordinance Amending Chapter 515 of the Mounds View City Code about the Licensing of 19 Tattoo and Body Art Establishments and to publish a summary of the Ordinance as authorized by 20 City Charter. 21 22 ROLL CALL: Hull/Stigney/Mueller/Gunn/Flaherty. 23 24 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 25 26 I. Resolution 7684, Authorizing INSPEC, Inc. to Prepare a Roof Management 27 Program and Perform Roof Repair Administration Services. 28 29 Public Works Director DeBar stated that this item is regarding a roof management plan for the 30 City’s 16 separate buildings. He indicated a comprehensive approach was being taken to manage 31 the roofs as there was over 100,000 square feet of roofing area and many of these roofs are 32 original and will need to be repaired or replaced in the near future. The City contacted several 33 companies and received two proposals from qualified consultants for the Roof Management 34 Program for fee amounts of $8,900 and $13,400. He recommended this plan proceed and be 35 completed before winter to assess the roofs and complete the necessary repairs. These expenses 36 were not included in the 2010 budget, but roof improvements could be completed under the 37 Special Projects account for the intermediate rehabilitation work to the Public Works facility. 38 Staff recommends authorizing INSPEC to prepare a Roof Management Program and perform 39 necessary roof repair for the higher priority repairs stemming from the Program evaluation. 40 41 Council Member Stigney questioned if INSPEC would be working as an independent contractor. 42 City Attorney Riggs stated this would be the best arrangement as INSPEC would be working on 43 behalf of the City. 44 45