Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Item 07I <br />December 13, 2010 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Revision #2. The League of MN Cities also suggested that the City consider changing the <br />Personnel Manual to reflect an “at will” employment environment rather than “just cause,” <br />as it would relate to discipline. (This has been discussed and revised by the Council in the <br />past.) With most employees covered by labor agreements, it would not seem worthwhile or <br />overly beneficial to change the Personnel Manual in this regard, however a related change <br />is needed regarding probationary employees. <br /> <br />Section 1.05 of the Manual relates to discipline, and the following is stated regarding <br />probationary employees: <br /> <br />Disciplinary action for just cause may be handled as deemed <br />appropriate by the City. This policy does not apply to new <br />probationary employees. New probationary employees may be <br />disciplined, at any time, for any reason, which does not violate the <br />law, subject to the rights of veterans. <br /> <br />The second sentence is underlined for emphasis. Later in the Personnel Manual, in <br />Section 1.37 which references Probationary Periods, conflicting language is present <br />regarding probationary employees: <br /> <br />New, probationary employees may be terminated by the City with <br />cause at any time, subject to the right of veterans. <br /> <br />To be consistent, both sections should be revised—Section 1.05 to include a reference to <br />termination, and Section 1.37, to change “with cause” to “with or without cause”. <br /> <br />Revision #3. Finally, in Section 1.05, the Progressive Discipline policy is articulated, with <br />“termination” being the final step, naturally. The language, however, seems more <br />indicative of a Council / Manager type of government than Mounds View’s Council / <br />Administrator format. The introductory paragraph under “terminations” reads as follows: <br /> <br />The City Administrator, or the Department Head with the <br />concurrence of the City Council, may terminate an employee. <br /> <br />The City Administrator does not have this authority, and most certainly a department head <br />does not have this authority (with the exception of temporary/seasonal employees). The <br />City Code, in Section 106.03, Subd 1b(9) indicates that the administrator provides advice <br />to the Council regarding dismissals: <br /> <br />Advise the Council in decisions affecting the employment or removal <br />of Department heads and appointed officials. <br /> <br />The above passage however is unclear regarding whose decision the removal is—the <br />Council’s or the Administrator’s. Historically, this action has been the domain of the <br />Council. If the City Council were to interpret the above passage to mean that the <br />administrator is simply required to keep the Council “advised” when he/she terminates an <br />employee, then the Personnel Manual would not need to be changed.