Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 22, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney asked if the properties should be identified in the Resolution. Attorney 1 <br />Riggs stated staff will submit a roll and that is part of the Resolution. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Council Member Mueller asked about the notification process. Finance Director Beer stated the 4 <br />property owner received the ticket, were allowed a number of days to pay the ticket, the Permit 5 <br />Technician sent a letter allowing 30 days to pay or it will be certified. If not paid, the property 6 <br />owner is sent a first class letter indicating there is public hearing if they wish to object and stating 7 <br />the amounts will be certified unless paid. He stated three months or longer has transpired since 8 <br />the City issued the ticket. 9 <br /> 10 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 11 <br /> 12 <br />2. Resolution 7468, Adopting a Special Assessment Levy for Private 13 <br />Improvements in Area A of the Street and Utility Improvement 14 <br />Program. (Waiver of Public Hearing) 15 <br /> 16 <br />Finance Director Beer explained the Council authorized private improvements as part of the Area 17 <br />A street project. Kennedy and Graven prepared a waiver of public hearing rights and acceptance 18 <br />of the charges so the action tonight is a formality. Once approved, the list will be sent to the 19 <br />County for collection, which includes a $35 administrative fee and interest. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Council Member Mueller clarified these costs are not covered by the street project because the 22 <br />improvements occur on private property at the request of the property owner. 23 <br /> 24 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Stigney. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7468, 25 <br />Adopting a Special Assessment Levy for Private Improvements in Area A of the Street and 26 <br />Utility Improvement Program. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Mayor Flaherty noted the costs being assessed and stated the prices are very reasonable. He 29 <br />encouraged residents that need work done to consider this option. 30 <br /> 31 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 32 <br /> 33 <br /> 34 <br />B. Continued Public Hearing: Resolution 7461, a Resolution to Consider an On 35 <br />Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for The Mermaid located at 2200 County 36 <br />Highway 10. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Clerk-Administrator Ericson stated that the public hearing was continued from the last meeting 39 <br />when the public hearing was opened and continued due to the potential sale of the hotel to 40 <br />address the unpaid taxes and City related expenses. However, the closing will not occur by June 41 <br />30, 2009. Clerk-Administrator Ericson noted the resolution recognizes the property owner has a 42 <br />plan in place for payment of current and back taxes and City costs to review the development. 43 <br />Staff recommends approval of the draft resolution that provides a 90-day extension for payment 44 <br />of those costs. He advised that staff would check the status and if payment is not made, 45