Laserfiche WebLink
November 24, 2008 Item No. 7H <br />Page 3 <br />Comments on the 1989 Drainage Study <br />Staff shared the 1989 Study with Bonestroo. Bonestroo performed an initial review of the <br />study, and essentially confirmed its findings. However, it appears that the improvements <br />proposed in the 1989 Study may not be warranted to the level of a 5-year design standard, <br />based on the perception of City Staff and residents living in this area. While residents in <br />this area have complained of rear yard nuisance flooding following heavy rains, the <br />improvements proposed in the 1989 Study appear to go well beyond what is necessary to <br />address the rear yard nuisance flooding. <br />Other concerns were noted with the 1989 Study as well. The Study assumed that the East <br />Detention Pond would be constructed by a developer. However, under present conditions <br />the City would need to acquire land and construct the pond itself. Also, the proposed <br />improvements are very expensive. Finally, the improvements would be physically <br />challenging. The proposed pipes are large diameter, and given the existing topography <br />they would be extremely shallow, especially on Sherwood Road. It would be very difficult, <br />and perhaps not even possible, to construct the proposed trunk storm sewer. <br />In addition to these facts, the issue of storm water management has changed greatly since <br />1989. A Stormwater Infiltration Program (SIP) was adopted in 2008 by the City. With the <br />discussion of the Spring Creek Regional Pond, the City has also recently indicated a <br />preference for avoiding the acquisition of land and construction of large regional ponds. <br />Proposed New Analysis <br />Based on this information, Staff suggests that a new analysis be performed on the Ardan <br />Avenue Drainage Subdistrict. The goals of the new analysis would be to eliminate the <br />East Detention Pond and identify an alternate to the Sherwood Road storm sewer <br />proposed in the 1989 Study, while still increasing the effectiveness of the storm sewer in <br />comparison to the existing system. It is hoped the alternate improvements would also be <br />lower cost than the improvements proposed in the 1989 Study. <br />The new analysis would not be done to the level of detail of the 1989 Study. The intent <br />would be to perform a more brief and practical analysis rather than a comprehensive study. <br />Comprehensive issues would be addressed in the overall Local Surface Water <br />Management Plan (LSWMP) for the City, which is currently being prepared. The findings <br />of the new analysis would be incorporated into the LSWMP when it is completed. <br />The scope of the proposed new analysis is shown in the attached letter from Bonestroo. It <br />should be noted that an important part of the analysis would be to perform some specific <br />site survey, to identify critical elevations of existing homes, garages, and other structures. <br />That information would allow the existing level of flood protection provided for these <br />structures to be determined. The improvements proposed by the new analysis would either <br />maintain or improve the flood protection.