My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2009/06/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
Agenda Packets - 2009/06/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:14 PM
Creation date
7/11/2018 9:35:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/9/2009
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/9/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Code Enforcement Staff Report <br />June 1, 2009 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />The City also uses the PSO position in the Police Department to help with code <br />enforcement. The Council budgeted this position for 30 hours a week (20 hours for Police <br />and 10 hours for code enforcement) for nine months a year and for 40 hours a week (20 <br />hours for each) for three months of the year (typically for June, July and August). <br />Unfortunately, Tyler Martin, the current PSO, because of other commitments, is not <br />available to work the additional 10 hours a week this summer as allowed by the budget. <br />He would have been spending those extra 10 hours per week on code enforcement. As <br />such, we do not now expect to use the additional 10 hours per week (120 total hours) for <br />the summer for the PSO. <br /> <br />According to Jeremiah, the City has opened 156 code enforcement cases to date in 2009 <br />compared to 42 cases for the same period in 2008. Of the 156 cases so far this year, staff <br />has closed 80 of them. Based on the large number of cases and strong public interest in <br />code enforcement, does the City Council want City staff to devote more staff time to code <br />enforcement? <br /> <br />If the Council does want to dedicate more city staff to code enforcement, then we would <br />need to formulate a plan to make that happen. That could involve: <br /> <br />1. Making the PSO position full-time (40 hours per week) for six or months a year. <br />The City would have to increase the budget for the additional hours and we would <br />advertise the position as such the next time there is a need to fill the PSO position. <br />This change, however, would not help the City in the short term. <br /> <br />2. Using the part time building inspector for some of the cases and inspections. This <br />would require adding 8 hours a week to his 16 hour a week schedule, as he is <br />staying busy with inspections and answering questions on the two days per week <br />that he is now working. <br /> <br />3. Having Planning Associate Heller take on some code enforcement cases (including <br />inspection, report writing and follow up) as her time allows. This will vary based on <br />the number of planning cases that come into the City and on the special planning <br />projects that the City may choose to have staff do. <br /> <br />In addition, might there be other staff in the Police Department available to help with code <br />enforcement? The City does not typically train police officers to do code enforcement <br />activities so this option would require education and training of officers about city codes, as <br />they would relate to code enforcement matters. Given an officer’s workload, this may not <br />be a feasible alternative. <br /> <br />Fines and Abatements <br /> <br />The City currently uses a system of increasing fines ($150, $300 and $450) for <br />administrative offenses (AO). Staff only issues an AO after giving the property owner or <br />responsible party a warning and time (usually 10 to 14 days) to correct a code violation. If <br />the property continues to have repeat occurrences of the same offense, then the fine for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.