My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1993/10/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
Agenda Packets - 1993/10/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:41 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 5:46:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/25/1993
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/25/1993
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br /> • OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS -6- SEPTEMBER 20, 1993 <br /> Moundsview Councilmember Blanchard questioned whether, if the name <br /> is changed, the Lions would be responsible for maintaining the <br /> park. <br /> Mayor Wells replied that the park would still be maintained by the <br /> cities of Spring Lake Park and Moundsview, with the Lions <br /> continuing to fund special projects and items not covered by the <br /> two city budgets. Mayor Wells stated that neither city could <br /> continue to maintain the park in the manner in which the Lions <br /> have. Mr Wells added that he felt that even if the name were <br /> changed to Lakeside Lions park, the residents of the area would <br /> still refer to it as Lakeside park, as this is how it is known to <br /> them. <br /> Councilmember Blanchard stated that what she is hearing tonight is <br /> very different from what was originally proposed. When this idea <br /> was first presented, she recalls, that the name was to be just <br /> "Lions Park" . She was strongly opposed to this. She agrees that <br /> the Lions have done a "fantastic job" of improving the park and she <br /> does not wish to take away from that. They certainly deserve <br /> recognition and she believes they have received that with the <br /> plaque that was placed at the park, and therefore people do realize <br /> what the Lions have done. She said she has a problem with the name <br /> change because this takes away from the originators of the park, <br /> 110 the people who did the "real work" on the park, not just writing a <br /> check and hiring someone to do the work. What is being presented <br /> tonight is different from the original proposal and she could <br /> "possibly" go along with this change. She stated that there are <br /> only four of the original founders still living, two are 88 years <br /> old and the other two are in their 70's. She feels we could just <br /> wait a few more years when their would be no problem in making a <br /> name change. <br /> Mayor Wells stated that we do not want to forget these individuals. <br /> CouncilmemberBlanchard replied that she did not intend to let <br /> anyone forget them. She continued, that she is adament about this. <br /> Those persons who originated the park did all of the clearing of <br /> the park themselves, took railroad ties and went out and dredged <br /> the lake by hand to make a swimming area. They had no fancy <br /> equipment. The VFW donated the flag pole. These people deserve to <br /> be remembered, they did not "hire" the work to be done, they did it <br /> themselves. Now if the name is to remain "Lakeside Lions Park" I <br /> would not argue too strongly against this. If you are proposing to <br /> make a change to "Lions Park" , I would be adamently against that. <br /> Councilmember Trude asked if the Lions are actually doing any work <br /> at the park or just donating their "pull-tab" money. <br /> Councilmember Mathiowetz stated that he felt we should back up a <br /> bit at this point. When the park was started, it was in <br /> cooperation of the two cities together. And it remains in that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.