My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1993/10/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
Agenda Packets - 1993/10/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:41 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 5:46:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/25/1993
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/25/1993
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS -7- SEPTEMBER 20, 1993 • <br /> type of situation today. In order for the park to remain in <br /> existance thiscooperation must continue. If the cities back out <br /> the park will revert back to the original owners, and is not a park <br /> at all. So therefore, it is not something that either city is <br /> trying to pull out of. In reference to "pull-tab monies" , the <br /> Lions certainly did use these monies, but also did a lot of hard <br /> work at the park, planting trees, general up-keep, etc. In <br /> reference to the comment regarding "just hiring someone to do the <br /> work" . We, both cities, would not allow that building to be built <br /> with volunteer labor. With the types of litigation the way they <br /> are, we had to run bids, we had to have engineering specs, we had <br /> to have the old building razed and the new building built, we had <br /> meet all fire codes, etc. Even if the Lions had wanted to, they <br /> would not have been allowed to build that building on their own. <br /> We had to have the city handle the funding through donated funds. <br /> When this issue came a few years ago and the two cities decided not <br /> to put the Lions name on the park, the Lions did not abandon the <br /> project but continued to give their support, both with their <br /> gambling money and labor. What we are requesting is not at the <br /> behest of the Lions Club, but this Council feels that they do <br /> deserve recognition for all that they have done at Lakeside Park, <br /> and we feel that this could be done by renaming the park to <br /> Lakeside Lions Park. <br /> Councilmember Trude commented that she is concerned that the 0 <br /> homeowners in the area would feel that the cities had abandoned the <br /> park with the name change. She asked if the Spring Lake Park <br /> Council had discussed this possibility. <br /> Mayor Wells replied that this issue has not been brought up to the <br /> council. <br /> Councilmember Trude stated that that would be her perception upon <br /> seeing the sign at the park, Lakeside Lions Park, that the Lions <br /> had established this park for the cities. She would feel that the <br /> cities no longer contributed to the upkeep of the park, which is <br /> not true. <br /> Mayor Linke stated that, as he understands it, the Lions are <br /> primarily contributing to the infrastricture of the park, the <br /> buildings, etc. , while the cities continue to support the basic <br /> upkeep of the park, grounds work, maintenance, etc. He stated that <br /> this should become a part of the history of the park. <br /> Councilmember Trude commented that perhaps they should call thier <br /> city hall Moundsview Lions City Hall as their Lions have <br /> contributed a lot to the plantings and upkeep of the grounds there. <br /> Mayor Linke reminded both Councils that both cities continue to <br /> contribute approximately $7,500 per year towards the park fund. 411 <br /> This is basically a line item, but should be remembered that we <br /> will continue to do so, and the park will continue to be run by the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.