Agenda Packets - 1993/11/01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2. specific projections of annual cost savings or more efficient service operations that are reasonably likely to result from the combined service or function (the plan must thoroughly document how the projected cost savings, if any, were delennined; all one-time only start-up costs should not be included in determining the cost of providing the service under the stared services agreement); and The annual cost savings projections to be outlined here are making the following assumptions: 1. Should the joint regional senior center facility not become a reality that each of the four participating communities would proceed with individually operating senior citizen programs. 2. The cities of Fridley and New Brighton would each operate programs requiring the full budget outlined here with Mounds View and Spring Lake Park each requiring one Inalf of this budget for a senior cilizcn'e program in their community (NOTE: 'therefore, the total costs of four communities operating separate programs would be 3 times the outlined budget.) Annual Operating Budget of Senior Program in Individual Communities Individual CATEGORY Communities Personal Services 93,977 Program (self—sustaining) 60.000 Subsidized Services 10,000 Office Supplies 750 Operating Supplies 1,000 Fuels 2,500 Laundry 500 Maintenance/Repair Supplies 750 Equipment Replacement 10.050 Professional Services 200 Communication 6,000 Transportation 500 Advertising 250 Dues and Subscriptions 400 Printing 6,200 Insurance 4,500 Auto Insurance 1,800 Conferences/Schools 1.000 Utilities 19,500 Services Contacted 1,000 Miscellaneous 250 Total 22_ 1,127 Program Income (60,000) Grants (42,055) Balance 119.07�?. (Represents lull budget each for Fridley and New Brighton; one half of this budget each for Mounds View and Spring Lake Park.]