Laserfiche WebLink
} <br /> 16 <br /> additional costs for maintenance . The utility would pay for <br /> • regional detention pond improvements and improvements to existing <br /> storm sewers and existing developed areas. New developments or <br /> private sewers are not a public benefit at the time of <br /> construction, and therefore these should be paid for by the <br /> developer. In the case of a new sewer or other facility in a <br /> development that will become public property, the benefit is <br /> originally to the developer to allow the development and the <br /> future maintenance and improvements will be the responsibility of <br /> the utility. <br /> The report previously presented recommended basing charges on the <br /> zoning of the parcel, not on the existing land use. This means <br /> that parcels that are under-utilized (such as residential use on <br /> a lot with commercial zoning) would be paying a higher rate than <br /> the land use may dictate. This is consistent with analyzing storm <br /> sewers and ponds for future use based on zoning rather than on <br /> existing land use. The owner also has the options of developing <br /> his parcel consistent with zoning, rezone consistent with the <br /> use, or appeal the charge. <br /> The report showed an example of using a 2 inch rain fallas the <br /> basis of charges. Due to infiltration (that portion off rain fall <br /> that soaks into the ground) the ratio of run-off between <br /> residential property and commercial property varies depending on <br /> the rain fall selected. The greater the rain fall, the less <br /> "infiltration credit" is reflected in the ratio . A 2 inch <br /> 0 rainfall would have a ratio of 2.9, commercial to residential. <br /> Basing the charge on the run-off of a 2 inch rain fall , <br /> commercial properties would pay 2 .9 times as much to the utility <br /> than would residential properties. <br /> Finally, an appeal process needs to be created. Appeals could be <br /> considered for vacant land or under-utilized land. Vacant land <br /> still produces run-off, but not in the quantity of developed <br /> land. The same is true of under-utilized land. A reduction in the <br /> charge may be appropriate in these situations, but it should be <br /> the responsibility of the property owner to ask for this <br /> reduction. The reduction could be based on the reduction in run- <br /> off due—VY—the under-utilizutiun the vac us of—the <br /> parcel. <br /> If the Council desires to proceed with the creation of a Surface <br /> Water Management Utility, Short-Elliott-Hendrickson. should be <br /> retained to prepare a final report and assist in the public <br /> information program. The final report would include a 'fee basis <br /> including recommended charges and expenditures , and a draft <br /> ordinance. <br /> 410 <br /> 2 <br />