My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-06-1990 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
08-06-1990 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:24 PM
Creation date
7/25/2018 5:46:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/6/1990
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/6/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The long term situation is the area where a number of issues need 411 <br /> to be resolved. First and foremost is the objectives the Council <br /> wishes to achieve with the position of Clerk-Administrator and <br /> the organization of City staff . Additionally, the Charter <br /> requirements of this position need to be met. Finally, the <br /> impacts of any change in the organizational structure upon the <br /> existing staff need to be considered. <br /> The department head team discussed alternatives to the existing <br /> organizational structure. Our determination is that basically 2 <br /> options exist. The first is to maintain the existing structure of <br /> a Clerk-Administrator and 4 department heads . The other <br /> alternative would be to assign one of the existing department <br /> heads as Clerk-Administrator and also have that person as a <br /> department head. <br /> Maintaining the current organizational structure would obviously <br /> necessitate hiring a new Clerk-Administrator. During our <br /> discussions, we felt that we may need to look closely at the <br /> possibility of some changes in the current staffing situation. <br /> Primarily, the vacancy in the City Planner position affords the <br /> opportunity to review where planning is assigned and what type of <br /> planning staff is appropriate. We felt that it may be more <br /> appropriate for the planning department to be a part of the <br /> engineering department rather than a separate department. In this • <br /> case, the planner position may be more appropriately a planning <br /> technician position or more of an entry level position. <br /> Reclassifying this position downward would allow some salary <br /> savings which then could be utilized for administrative interns <br /> or supporting a Deputy Clerk/Administrative Assistant position. <br /> In any case, I believe there should be funds budgeted for <br /> temporary clerical help to cover periods of heavy work load and <br /> vacation or extended sick leave periods. <br /> These types of minor changes would focus the Clerk-Administrator <br /> - _ ,� _ . . ' . . - ��. � . • - „- t team with the ma 'orit <br /> of work load in the various department and the Clerk- <br /> Administrators work load concentrated on coordination of work and <br /> communication both internal and external to the City. <br /> The other alternative discussed was to assign one of the current <br /> department heads as Clerk-Administrator. In this event it would <br /> be necessary to "beef-up” the administrative department and the <br /> department of the new Clerk-Administrator. I believe that this <br /> still necessitates review of the planner position as previously <br /> discussed in this memo. However, in this case it may be <br /> appropriate to consider an administrative assistant/city planner <br /> or the planning technician may still be appropriate. <br /> This organizational structure definitely requires a Deputy Clerk • <br /> position to be more functional in handling the traditional City <br /> Clerk duties such as elections, licensing, etc. An additional <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.