My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1990/08/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
Agenda Packets - 1990/08/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:24 PM
Creation date
7/25/2018 5:46:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/6/1990
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/6/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' r • <br /> AUG ' 90 7: 46 FROM ARCHITECTURAL ALLIANC PAGE . O11 <br /> • <br /> OPTION C <br /> Pros <br /> • <br /> The existing basement is emptied of people related functions. The Offices and Community <br /> Room are moved_ <br /> The Community Room is enhanced(windows to the outside,increased area,and improved <br /> public access). <br /> Staff access con be provided internally through the shared Conference Room in the <br /> Parks,Recreation,and Fortry/Public'Works area. <br /> A separate 24-hour entrance is provided for the Police Department. <br /> All Police Department offices have potential for outside windows. <br /> The existing Community Room space could serve for Police Trai ing,other staff meetings, <br /> Council Chamber overflow and public uses. <br /> Overall there is more meeting space. <br /> Cons • <br /> The Council Chamber remains the same size though space is added for storage of media <br /> equipment <br /> • <br /> The Waiting Area is inadegtiate. <br /> The Waiting Area could,however,be extended to the east. These costs are included. <br /> Both Option-1i and Option C are relatively equal in cost. The City of Mounds View may have <br /> priorities in considering these options. Based upon information previously stated in the outline <br /> and in the complete Space Needs Study,it is the recommendation of the architectsthat Option C <br /> be implemented. Option C provides more meeting space than Option B induding an <br /> above-ground Community Room. Construction sequencing would be more flexible and the <br /> construction scope would be less disruptive for Option C <br /> The City may want to consider an altonate deduct which would include the remodeling of a <br /> future-vacated Water Filtration Facility into a new Community Room. The recommendation of <br /> the architects is that the City proceed with the whole package to save the cost of re-staging of <br /> construction and of inflation. <br /> • <br /> F-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.