My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-06-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
11-06-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2018 11:16:32 AM
Creation date
7/26/2018 11:16:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
11/6/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission November 6, 1996 <br /> Regular Meeting Page.3 <br /> required under the City's existing Code and <br /> what parking is in place on the site. She <br /> explained that there is a specific request from <br /> the applicant for a variance in the parking ratios <br /> that apply to the property and a request for joint <br /> use of parking under a conditional use permit. <br /> She continued by explaining that joint use of <br /> parking recognizes that some uses are night <br /> time uses and some are day time uses and they <br /> off-set each other. She added that the number <br /> of parking spaces on the site at present is 477, <br /> and if the new restaurants and retail space <br /> were added, some parking spaces would be <br /> eliminated so that the number of the spaces on <br /> site would be 454. Commissioner Miller <br /> inquired if 111, 775 square feet is a typo (on <br /> Page 2, 1st paragraph, of the staff report) and <br /> she was informed that it should read 111,535. <br /> Director Sheldon explained that it was Staff's <br /> understanding from the Planning Commission <br /> at their last meeting that they are willing to look <br /> at the existing parking in place as being <br /> adequate for the existing space and explained <br /> that the applicant did get a previous variance to <br /> allow for the 477 spaces to be used for the <br /> existing square footage. She continued by <br /> asking what ratios are to be applied against the <br /> new footage. She explained that the proposal <br /> is for 4-1/2 spaces per 1,000 square feet and <br /> that our current code requires 10 spaces but <br /> added that our code is much higher than other <br /> jurisdictions. She continued by explaining that <br /> the ratio proposed for fast food restaurants is at <br /> our regular requirement (1 space for every 40 <br /> square foot of dining and 1 space for every 80 <br /> square feet of kitchen) but the dinner house <br /> restaurants are proposed at 1 space for every <br /> 80 square feet of dining and 1 space for every <br /> 80 square feet of kitchen, which she explained <br /> • is a more typical ratio for larger restaurants <br /> where you have less customer turn-over. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.