Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 <br /> • Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> Kaden asked who would pay for the drainage improvements. Ericson stated that the applicant would <br /> be responsible for the cost of the improvements, however, the other impacted property owners might <br /> contribute. <br /> Chair Peterson asked about the warranty for the drainage plan. Ericson stated that there would be <br /> a warranty period to cover repairs should they be needed. In the future, repairs would be the City's <br /> responsibility which, in his opinion, would be desirable to private ownership. <br /> Miller asked about entrances for emergency vehicles. Ericson stated this was not a deep property and <br /> vehicles could ingress and egress without difficulty. He stated that the lots were small enough to <br /> insure access. Miller asked where the fire hydrant was located. Bill Juaire stated that it was located <br /> at the southern corner of the lot. <br /> Hegland asked why there appeared to be a rush to consider this application. Ericson explained that <br /> he had been working with the applicant for two months, during which time it was not made known <br /> to the developer that they would be required to come before the City Council. He stated that staff <br /> was attempting to minimize the impact to the applicant due to not addressing the matter earlier. He <br /> • added that if the Planning Commission was not comfortable with adopting the Resolution at this time, <br /> they could hold the matter over until the next meeting. <br /> Kaden asked what guarantees the requirements would be met if the Planning Commission made their <br /> recommendation to the City Council to approve. Ericson stated that if the conditions were not met, <br /> staff would bring it forward at the next Council meeting and recommend denial. <br /> Hegland requested the addition of Item 2e, to address revisions to the parking lot and providing <br /> additional on-site parking spaces. <br /> Braathen requested clarification to language regarding the drainage plan. Ericson stated that Page <br /> 2 of the Resolution indicates"The final drainage plan will be submitted and will be approved by the <br /> City Engineer." <br /> Miller requested the word "them" in Item 4 of the Resolution be omitted. <br /> Kaden asked if the language pertaining to the landscaping was sufficient. Ericson stated that staff <br /> would review the language based upon the discussion, but he believed it was sufficient. <br /> Chair Peterson requested that Condition 1 of the Resolution include the statement "approved by City <br /> staff and the City Forester." <br />