Laserfiche WebLink
Siercks CUP Request <br />March 28, 2005 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />(4) The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the <br />City and to the existing land use. <br /> <br />The City Council has historically supported granting conditional use permits for oversized <br />garages when consistent with the zoning regulations. <br /> <br />(5) The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning <br />district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. <br /> <br />The expanded garage is consistent with the provisions and purposes of the zoning code. <br /> <br />(6) The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> <br />The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential <br />areas so as to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and <br />residential property in general. <br /> <br />(7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br /> <br />There would be no additional traffic generated by this request. <br /> <br />(8) Adequate utilities, access, drainage and facilities have been or will be provided. <br /> <br />All utilities and infrastructure are presently available and sufficient. <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Commission Review <br /> <br />Chapter 1125 of the Zoning Code requires that the Planning Commission review and <br />address any potential adverse effects which include, but are not limited to, relationship with <br />the Comprehensive Plan, geographical area involved, potential depreciation, the character of <br />the surrounding area and the demonstrated need for such a use. Each of these potential <br />adverse effects is addressed on below. <br /> <br />Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. As previously stated, the Comprehensive Plan <br />encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas so as to improve the <br />quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential property in general. <br />5343 Clifton Drive is designated as low-density residential and the proposed garage <br />expansion would not be inconsistent with the Comp Plan. <br /> <br />The Geographical Area Involved. The applicants’ home is located on Clifton Drive. The <br />proposed garage expansion would not be out of place for this area and the size of the <br />applicant’s lot would accommodate the expanded garage. <br /> <br />Depreciation. The garage expansion would benefit the subject property both in a practical <br />sense by providing additional on site, indoor parking and storage area, and in an economic <br />sense, as the addition would increase the “value” of the property. Increased property values <br />are of course a benefit to everyone. <br />