Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />• Page 18, Kennedy and Graven, referenced the last two items, Waldoch Minor Subdivision 1 <br />and Meyer/Holmberg Minor Subdivision, stating that these have been paid and should be 2 <br />removed from the report. 3 <br /> 4 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Marty/Gunn. To approve the Just and Correct Claims as presented. 5 <br /> 6 <br /> Ayes - 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 7 <br /> 8 <br />8. CONSENT AGENDA 9 <br /> 10 <br />A. Schedule a Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m. on Monday, June 13, 2005, to 11 <br />Consider Ordinance 759, Amending Section 4.02 (Filing for Office) of the 12 <br />Mounds View City Charter. 13 <br />B. Resolution 6538, Approving a Contract with CorVel Corporation for 14 <br />Workers’ Compensation Managed Care Services. 15 <br />C. Resolution 6539, Consideration of Application to Voluntary Investigation 16 <br />and Cleanup Program (VIC) for City Property known as the Former Sysco 17 <br />Property. 18 <br />D. Licenses for Approval. 19 <br /> 20 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Stigney To Approve the Consent Agenda as presented. 21 <br /> 22 <br /> Ayes - 4 Nays-0 Motion carried. 23 <br /> 24 <br />9. COUNCIL BUSINESS. 25 <br /> 26 <br />A. 7:05 Public Hearing to Consider Resolution 6540, Approving a 27 <br />Comprehensive Land Use Amendment for The Bridges of Mounds View Golf 28 <br />Course Site. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Director Ericson explained that this is to consider and review the proposed land use amendment 31 <br />noting that this should be limited to the public hearing with action being taken at the next City 32 <br />Council meeting. He stated that they have been actively exploring redevelopment of the area and 33 <br />the proposed land use designation would then be consistent. He stated that it was recommended 34 <br />in 2003 that the area should be industrial and in September the EDA recommended a review. He 35 <br />explained that within the Comprehensive Plan the land use currently is split between OSP and 36 <br />SRO noting that the designations are consistent with the land use for the golf course. He stated 37 <br />that the City asked RLK to help prepare a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment, which went to 38 <br />the Planning Commission for review and was recommended for approval. He stated that the 39 <br />proposed amendment was then forwarded to the Metropolitan Council for their review and 40 <br />approval and it was felt that what was proposed was consistent and addressed the possible 41 <br />expansion at the golf course. He stated that approval was recommended on April 27th. He 42 <br />clarified that if the proposal were approved at a future meeting it would not obligate the City to 43 <br />do anything with the proposed redevelopment at the golf course. He explained that the 44 <br />Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment would change the land use map to be consistent with 45