Agenda Packets - 2005/06/13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 5 industrial. He stated that notices were sent to the Residents and also posted in paper. He asked 1 that the motion be postponed until the next City Council meeting. 2 3 Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 7:43 p.m. 4 5 Brian Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, clarified his understanding and asked if the City has a 6 drawing of the area that would be re-designated? He noted that a portion of the area is supposed 7 to include trails noting that he is curious as to whether the re-designation is for the entire golf 8 course space or just part of it. 9 10 Director Ericson explained that the area is partly designated OSP and SRO and reviewed the 11 areas with the Council. He stated that the changes would make the areas consistent with the land 12 uses to the north and northeast with the Sysco development. 13 14 Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, asked what the Planning Commission is recommending 15 for this area. 16 17 Director Ericson stated that the Planning Commission held a public hearing and unanimously 18 recommended OFC. 19 20 Barbara Haake, 3420 County Road I, referenced Statue 462.355 noting that it states that a 21 governing body may, by resolution, adopt the proposed amendment and asked City Attorney 22 Riggs if he felt they would have a two-thirds vote to adopt next Monday. 23 24 City Attorney Riggs stated he does not know. He stated that if they have a situation with six 25 billboards, zoning should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan noting that if it is not 26 consistent that it could raise issues with the permits. 27 28 Ms. Haake clarified that this would address an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for 29 MS462.355. She explained that she wants assurance that when they do vote that it is done with 30 two-thirds of the membership, which means at least four members of the Council must be 31 present. 32 33 City Attorney Riggs confirmed that approval of the amendment would require a two-thirds vote 34 in order to be consistent with permits. 35 36 Bob Glazer, 2625 Hillview Road, clarified that the Public Hearing was designated by the 37 Planning Commission and asked if notice went to all Mounds View residents or only the 38 neighboring residents. 39 40 Director Ericson clarified that notices were sent to residents located 300-feet from the property 41 and it was also announced in the local paper. 42 43 Barbara Haake noted that the notice was issued to residents within 350-feet of the property line 44 and asked if this would be considered the same in this situation, as it states in Item 462.355 that 45