My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/07/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/07/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:10 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 2:10:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/25/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/25/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 27, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 22 <br /> <br />has no idea what the service is. She apologized to Public Director Lee stating that she did not 1 <br />have a chance to get to this item and contact him to ask her questions. She stated that she 2 <br />couldn’t agree to changing the phone service without knowing more about what they are 3 <br />switching to. She stated that she wants to know what they are looking at first. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Mayor Marty asked if Roseville has a number for them to call if they do have any problems. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Council Member Thomas stated that it would be great to say ‘who’ but that doesn’t give any idea 8 <br />what the system is or who the provider is. She expressed concerns stating that they do not know 9 <br />what they are signing up for. She stated that she understands the technology but that doesn’t tell 10 <br />her anything about the service provider. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Council Member Gunn asked what would happen if this is postponed. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that if this request is postponed to July 11th it would push back 15 <br />the City Hall renovation by a month. He stated that right now they are looking at a mid-16 <br />September start and this would push it into mid-October. He apologized noting that they are 17 <br />limited staff here and in areas they are not experts in adding that they are trying to move this 18 <br />along and bring these items to Council as soon as they can. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Council Member Flaherty asked if this is part of renovation budget. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Public Works Director Less confirmed that this is part of the soft costs involved in the City Hall 23 <br />Renovation Project. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Council Member Gunn clarified that Roseville has had this system for a while now and asked if 26 <br />they are satisfied with the system. She asked if there are other cities connected with this type of 27 <br />service. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Public Works Director Lee confirmed that they have been on the system for a while and 30 <br />absolutely love it. He noted that there are several other cities on this system and have not had 31 <br />any problems. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Council Member Gunn stated that she is going to go with her gut instinct noting that if Roseville 34 <br />is doing great and other cities have also committed with Roseville and they are not having 35 <br />problems, she noted that because of the time constraints she is going to go with this proposal. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Council Member Stigney stated that he is in agreement with Council Member Thomas. He 38 <br />expressed concerns stating that they don’t even know what kind of a phone system they have here 39 <br />and now they are asking Council to approve a new system. He stated that there are too many 40 <br />unanswered questions adding that he cannot support the installation of a new phone system at 41 <br />this time. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Council Member Thomas clarified that she does not expect anyone’s service to fail. She stated 44 <br />that she understands that this is a good quality service and in some cases better than analog 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.