My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/07/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/07/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:10 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 2:10:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/25/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/25/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 27, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 23 <br /> <br />service. She explained that her concern is that she is being asked to approve a joint powers 1 <br />agreement to which she has no details on what they would get for the money. She stated that she 2 <br />is concerned about approving a contract to enter into a joint powers agreement and she has no 3 <br />clue what is in the agreement. 4 <br /> 5 <br /> Public Works Director Lee noted that a big portion of the cost is to upgrade the phones 6 <br />themselves and suggested finding a way that they could contract with Roseville. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Council Member Thomas stated that the phones would come from the service provider so the city 9 <br />would have to decide on the service provider and a service agreement before any upgrades can be 10 <br />done. She stated that Roseville couldn’t do any work until the Council agrees to the joint powers 11 <br />agreement to do work on their behalf. She stated that he is still asking her to approve a joint 12 <br />powers agreement with Roseville to use whatever they’ve got and she doesn’t know what they 13 <br />have. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Council Member Stigney referenced the estimated costs included in the resolution is changed to 16 <br />$25,000.00, not including the network switch adding that if this is a quote why isn’t the 17 <br />statement ‘not to exceed’ included in the verbiage. He stated that he does have problems with 18 <br />the wording of the resolution. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Mayor Marty agreed that they do need to move forward with the City Hall project adding that he 21 <br />has to concur. He stated that the Council does need to know more and expressed concerns that 22 <br />this would delay the renovation process. He stated that the Council does need more information 23 <br />before the Council can vote on it. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Council Member Stigney asked if they could get some hard figures and detail to review. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that he would have Roseville present at the next Council 28 <br />meeting or work session. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Council Member Thomas stated that she would be willing to call to order a special meeting at the 31 <br />work session to review this issue if Roseville could be available. She asked Public Works 32 <br />Director Lee to put together the details for the types of service and the contract. She stated that 33 <br />she would also like to have Roseville at the next meeting. 34 <br /> 35 <br />MOTION/SECOND Gunn/Marty To Approve Resolution 6565 Approving the migration to 36 <br />IP Telephony (City Hall Renovation Project) and waive the reading. 37 <br /> 38 <br /> Ayes–0 Nays – 5 Motion failed. 39 <br /> 40 <br /> N. Moved to July 25, 2005 City Council Agenda - Resolution 6567 Approving 41 <br />the Hire of Peter Berling to the position of Police Officer. 42 <br /> 43 <br /> O. Resolution 6568 Approving the Promotion of Steve Menard to the position of 44 <br />Sergeant. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.