Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br /> Planning Case No. 464-96: 2375 Highway 10 <br /> November 6, 1996 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Signage <br /> The existing signage includes the following: <br /> • existing pylon sign 10'x 10' on 26'high supports; area= 100 sq.ft. <br /> • existing wall sign 23" x 26.5'; area= 50.8 sq.ft. <br /> • used car sign, ground mounted 8' 6-1/2" x 5'=42.7 sq.ft. <br /> • miscellaneous small directional signs <br /> The total signage on the site is 193.5 square feet. All of the signage has approved permits. <br /> The B-3 district allows for 100 square feet per business occupant,and one general <br /> pedestal sign not exceeding 340 square feet. Only one pedestal sign is allowed per <br /> property. The current signage is within the allowances in the Code. The applicant is <br /> proposing two additional monument signs: one at the northernmost driveway on Highway <br /> 10 and one at the easternmost driveway on County Road H2. Both of these signs would <br /> have the same dimensions as the existing monument sign on Highway 10 (42.7 square <br /> feet). The applicant's reason for the additional signage is to better identify driveway <br /> entrances and direct customer traffic. The total signage on the site including the new <br /> signage would be: <br /> • existing pylon sign 10'x 10' on 26' high supports; area= 100 sq.ft. <br /> • existing wall sign 23" x 26.5'; area= 50.8 sq.ft. <br /> • used car sign, ground mounted 8' 6-1/2" x 5'=42.7 sq.ft. <br /> • two new ground mounted 8' 6-1/2" x 5'= 85.4 sq.ft. <br /> • miscellaneous small directional signs <br /> Total Signage= 278.9 sq. ft. <br /> Total Permitted = 100 sq. ft. of signage per tenant; 340 sq. ft. pylon sign=440 sq.ft. <br /> The signage on the site is well within the total signage area allowed. Square footage has <br /> been redistributed to the monument signs from the allowances for tenant and pylon signs. <br /> Staff feels that this approach is acceptable and makes the signage package more <br /> functional. Staff also feels that this redistribution requires approval of a variance which <br /> would have to be scheduled for the Planning Commission's December 4 meeting, due to <br /> notice requirements: <br /> I <br />